Two rumors are spreading rapidly in the market: First rumor: Trump will sign a major cryptocurrency-related executive order at 2:30 PM Eastern Time. Specific details have not been disclosed, but the timing and the two key words "executive order" alone are already drawing significant attention. Second rumor (even bigger): According to multiple sources, the US has seized approximately 600,000 BTC, traced to Venezuelan-related assets, and—not for sale, but planned to be directly incorporated into America's strategic Bitcoin reserves. If this claim is true, what does it mean? It means at the national level, approximately 3% of Bitcoin's circulating supply would be permanently locked up. Not an ETF, not custodial holdings, but "sovereign-level long-term holdings." This is no longer a question of short-term bullish or bearish benefits, but rather a structural shift in Bitcoin's positioning at the state asset level. Of course, I must emphasize one thing: These are currently rumors and allegations—no official confirmation yet. But if news of this magnitude is verified, the market's pricing logic will likely need recalculation. If the rumors hold true, the only remaining question might be— Can $BTC still be viewed through the lens of the past? Watch, take note, don't rush to conclusions. Nights like this are usually not simple. #bitcoin #BTC #特朗普 #加密货币 #宏观观察
🚨 Breaking late-night news—take note.
Two rumors are spreading rapidly in the market:
First rumor:
Trump will sign a major cryptocurrency-related executive order at 2:30 PM Eastern Time.
Specific details have not been disclosed, but the timing and the two key words "executive order" alone are already drawing significant attention.
Second rumor (even bigger):
According to multiple sources, the US has seized approximately 600,000 BTC, traced to Venezuelan-related assets,
and—not for sale, but planned to be directly incorporated into America's strategic Bitcoin reserves.
If this claim is true, what does it mean?
It means at the national level, approximately 3% of Bitcoin's circulating supply would be permanently locked up. Not an ETF, not custodial holdings, but "sovereign-level long-term holdings."
This is no longer a question of short-term bullish or bearish benefits, but rather a structural shift in Bitcoin's positioning at the state asset level.
Of course, I must emphasize one thing:
These are currently rumors and allegations—no official confirmation yet.
But if news of this magnitude is verified, the market's pricing logic will likely need recalculation.
If the rumors hold true, the only remaining question might be—
Can $BTC still be viewed through the lens of the past?
Watch, take note, don't rush to conclusions.
Nights like this are usually not simple.
#bitcoin #BTC #特朗普 #加密货币 #宏观观察