Recently, I keep encountering long articles written by AI, with analyses that are quite insightful, but after reading them, I feel like I haven't gained anything.

The biggest problem isn't actually a lack of information, but rather the flood of synthetic garbage that’s drowning everything.

When AI can produce 10,000 words in a second, 99% of online content naturally depreciates into noise.

For many people, the competitive landscape is shifting: in the past, it was about who could dig up more info; now, it’s more about who can ruthlessly filter out more trash.

We should develop a sufficiently strict information filter that only leaves sources that are counterintuitive, reliable, but not too comfortable—probably more valuable than hoarding a bunch of AI writing tools.

What you feed your brain over the long term probably determines the kind of judgments you produce.