This design allows both new projects and mature projects to fully utilize the platform. For projects that are already operational, they have two routes: first, to directly purchase paid services such as Liquidity engines, Bots, etc., to optimize market performance; second, to submit adjustment requests through the platform form to flexibly reallocate the creator fee structure. This dual-track system gives the project party more autonomy, catering to the lightweight needs of early-stage projects while also meeting the customized operational requirements of large projects.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
Ramen_Until_Richvip
· 5h ago
It sounds a bit competitive, with big projects involving both robots and customization. How do small projects survive?
View OriginalReply0
SandwichVictimvip
· 12-22 09:50
The dual-track system design does give the project party a chance to breathe, but can those small projects really afford the paid services?
View OriginalReply0
Blockchainiacvip
· 12-22 09:43
The dual-track system sounds good, but the real question is whether small projects have the money to pay for those paid services.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)