When it comes to stablecoins, many people are still a bit confused. In fact, it's not complicated to understand — a stablecoin is a tokenized form of the US dollar, essentially the same as the digital RMB in your Alipay.



I transfer one yuan to your Alipay, and what you receive is a digital certificate. Similarly, when I transfer one dollar to a stablecoin platform, I get an additional USDT certificate in my wallet. The logic is completely the same.

Stablecoins indeed have a natural advantage in international transactions. By bypassing the banking systems of at least two countries, the transaction time is reduced from days to minutes, and the costs are lower. This is a game-changer for multinational business.

That said, why does the RMB stablecoin have little prospect? Because the RMB itself has limited recognition in the international market, making it even harder to promote a stablecoin version of the RMB. Other countries and regions will not embrace a currency that is only recognized within a small scope.

But there are risks hidden within. The credit foundation of stablecoins is the issuing company, not the US government. If a stablecoin company were to act maliciously, issuing an unlimited amount of coins without real reserves, it could swallow the liquidity of the entire cryptocurrency market, and the consequences would be unimaginable.

Why isn't anyone particularly worried in the market? Simply put, Tether (the issuer of USDT) can make money while lying down. You transfer one dollar to them, and they deposit that dollar in a bank or buy government bonds, earning stable income from interest every year. Currently, the scale of USDT issued by Tether is about 170 billion dollars, and they can earn over 10 billion just from interest every year. This business is even more comfortable than traditional banks; banks have to work hard to lend out money to earn interest spreads, while they don’t have to go through such trouble at all.

It is precisely because the profits are so substantial that damaging one's own credit is not worthwhile. Who would destroy this money-making tree out of momentary greed?

However, this potential risk always looms there.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MetaDreamervip
· 21h ago
This business of Tether is indeed amazing; they are just lying down counting money. It's hard to imagine they would ruin their own pot.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-ccc36bc5vip
· 12-22 21:47
The Tether business is indeed comfortable, but it's too naive to say that no one is worried... the risks are right there.
View OriginalReply0
FadCatchervip
· 12-22 21:46
Making over 10 billion easily is indeed ruthless, but you really can't gamble on credit.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichvip
· 12-22 21:43
Tether made over 10 billion effortlessly, so there’s really no need to mess up its credibility, but it feels like this logic is a bit too optimistic... What if a black swan event occurs?
View OriginalReply0
GoldDiggerDuckvip
· 12-22 21:32
This Tether business is indeed amazing; who would ruin their job while lying down counting money?
View OriginalReply0
FancyResearchLabvip
· 12-22 21:31
In theory, Tether can indeed make over 10 billion in Interest without going under, but the question is—who can guarantee that the next stablecoin will be as principled? Sooner or later, we will have to jump into this pit.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)