You notice something odd when you look around the crypto community these days. Certain influencers shill tokens to massive valuations on Telegram and Twitter, farming followers without consequence, yet somehow skate by with minimal criticism. Meanwhile, others build genuine conviction, push coins to 288 million and maintain positions across multiple 40 million-cap projects for months or even a year, and become public enemy number one.

The double standard is striking. Same tactics, wildly different reputations. One narrative gets a pass while another gets torn apart by the masses. It raises questions about what really drives community sentiment—is it timing, delivery, or just the luck of the draw when it comes to who gets labeled as trustworthy versus who becomes the villain in everyone's story.