Here's something worth examining: Bitcoin's price has never held below its electrical production cost over any meaningful period. This isn't coincidence—it's economics at work. When mining becomes unprofitable, hash rate drops, difficulty adjusts downward, and the network self-corrects. The cost of electricity essentially acts as a hard floor under BTC valuation. Miners' break-even threshold becomes the market's natural support level.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ApyWhisperer
· 7h ago
Electricity cost is really the bottom line for Bitcoin; this logic is quite solid.
View OriginalReply0
RamenDeFiSurvivor
· 7h ago
Damn, this logic sounds solid... Is the electricity cost really the floor price of BTC?
View OriginalReply0
RektButSmiling
· 8h ago
Is the mining cost the bottom price? Then why did it drop so badly last year?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWitch
· 8h ago
Is electricity cost the support level? This logic somehow feels a bit off to me.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiSherpa
· 8h ago
Mining costs are the bottom line; this logic makes perfect sense.
View OriginalReply0
TokenVelocity
· 8h ago
This logic sounds great at first, but can electricity costs really be considered a hard bottom line? Given the huge global differences in miner cost structures, how is it calculated?
Here's something worth examining: Bitcoin's price has never held below its electrical production cost over any meaningful period. This isn't coincidence—it's economics at work. When mining becomes unprofitable, hash rate drops, difficulty adjusts downward, and the network self-corrects. The cost of electricity essentially acts as a hard floor under BTC valuation. Miners' break-even threshold becomes the market's natural support level.