🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
The results of the recent ARFC proposal voting in Aave DAO have been announced, and this time it did not pass. According to the data, the opposition camp received 994,800 votes (55.29%), abstentions accounted for 741,600 votes (41.21%), and support only garnered 63,000 votes (3.5%).
The original intention of this proposal is actually quite interesting — Aave DAO and AAVE token holders want to regain full control over the Aave brand, naming rights, and related assets. From the voting results, the community's stance is very clear. The overwhelmingly higher number of opposition votes compared to support indicates that the token holders involved in governance see little need for major changes to the current brand management model, or they are cautious about this plan to reclaim control.
Such governance voting data can actually reflect the true opinions within the DAO on key issues, and it is worth continuously monitoring the development trends of the Aave ecosystem.