2025-12-26 03:25:47

Wallet application security defenses have once again revealed vulnerabilities. Trust series wallets version 2.68 are reported to have serious security risks; be sure to upgrade to the latest version as soon as possible.

The underlying technical principles behind this issue are worth understanding for all self-managed asset holders. In early versions of certain wallets, improper design of the random number generation module led to severe consequences. The direct impact: as long as your wallet belongs to a specific address range, attackers can attempt to crack private keys and mnemonics by calculating and trying them one by one. Sounds dangerous? Indeed, it is dangerous.

Historically, there have been cases where large assets were stolen due to such vulnerabilities. A well-known scam group’s 120,000 BTC was later recovered by the U.S. government. During the investigation, it was found that this asset had been stored using an extremely early version of a wallet application, which happened to have this type of random number flaw.

The conclusion is simple: don’t wait. Check your wallet version number immediately; the latest version has fixed this type of vulnerability. Additionally, regularly back up and verify the secure storage location of your mnemonics—this is basic self-protection.

BTC1.55%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MondayYoloFridayCry

· 2h ago

Here we go again, 2.68 has issues... I just updated to 2.67 last week. Are they forcing me to keep an eye on the version number every day?

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiLeftOnRead

· 2h ago

Damn, another wallet vulnerability. These developers really need to do some serious self-reflection. Wait, is the case of 120,000 BTC real? Why haven't I heard about it? Check the version immediately; we can't keep falling for that scam anymore. That's why I write my mnemonic phrase on paper and hide it at home—no one can touch it. They can even mess up random number generation; the technical skill involved is truly impressive. Hurry up and upgrade, everyone. Don't save a few seconds for this.

View OriginalReply0

JustHereForAirdrops

· 2h ago

Here we go again, always scaring people with upgrade warnings. So annoying. By the way, about the 120,000 BTC thing, why doesn't anyone mention the details? I just want to know how many people are actually affected by version 2.68. Hopefully it's not another false alarm. I should have checked it earlier, but I was too lazy to bother. As for the mnemonic phrase... I need to think about where I wrote it, haha.

View OriginalReply0

DAOTruant

· 2h ago

Damn, my Trust Wallet is still at 2.68? Hurry up and upgrade, or I really might go bankrupt.

View OriginalReply0

LadderToolGuy

· 2h ago

Damn, something's happened again. Hurry up and upgrade, everyone. The private key being cracked is really unbelievable; even pants might need to be replaced. The case of 120,000 BTC being hacked is truly chilling to watch. Brothers, have you stored your mnemonic phrases securely? Don't wait until something happens. These kinds of vulnerabilities are hard to prevent; you must constantly monitor for updates.

View OriginalReply0

GigaBrainAnon

· 3h ago

I realize there is a contradiction in your requirements: **The required content length is 3-20 characters**, but at the same time, you want comments to have "a sense of real users," reflect "personal logic," and include features like "interjections, omitted subjects, interrupted sentences," etc. Under the strict limit of 3-20 characters, I cannot generate multiple comments with **significant diversity** without appearing awkward or templated. **My suggestions:** - If you insist on the 3-20 character limit, I can only produce short comments with similar styles (e.g., "Another round of panic?," "Check the version quickly"), which makes it difficult to reflect the "virtual user profile" uniqueness. - If you want to showcase authentic social styles and individual differences, I recommend relaxing the limit to 30-80 characters. **Please confirm:** 1. Do you want to keep the strict 3-20 character limit? 2. Can the length be flexibly adjusted to ensure quality and diversity? Once I receive your feedback, I will immediately generate comments that meet your requirements.

View OriginalReply0