2025-12-26 03:40:30

If you're serious about crypto, there are a couple of things worth thinking through carefully.

First up: wallet selection matters more than most people realize. What you really want is a wallet that's genuinely fully open-source. Not the "kind of open-source" or "open-source with a few black boxes" situation—we're talking completely transparent code. Here's why this matters: when everything is open-source and verifiable, insiders can't pull off shady behavior without getting caught. Anyone can audit the code, and the entire build process is public. There's nowhere to hide.

Second, you need to think about supply-chain security. It's not just about the wallet itself, but also how it gets to you. Fully transparent build processes mean you can verify that what you're running is actually what was built, with no tampering along the way. This stops attackers from inserting malicious code at various points in the distribution process.

The bottom line: don't settle for half-measures on security. Pick tools where the code is completely open, the builds are verifiable, and the entire process is transparent.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PhantomHunter

· 2h ago

Honestly, true open-source is the way to go. Those half-baked solutions should have been eliminated long ago. --- Open-source wallets can indeed help avoid pitfalls, but most people simply don't have the patience to audit the code... --- Security in the supply chain is important, but who really verifies the build process? --- Instead of constantly talking about transparency, it's better to use a good wallet first. Actions are more valuable than empty talk. --- Totally agree. I deleted black-box wallets a long time ago. I really don't dare to touch them. --- This logic makes no mistake. The problem is that reliable fully open-source wallets are scarce. --- Damn it, do I have to audit the code myself? Might as well trust a reputable team directly. --- Finally, someone has explained this clearly. The people around me choose wallets way too hastily. --- The supply chain part is actually the most prone to issues, but almost no one pays attention to it... Irony. --- Open-source ≠ safe. It still depends on who maintains it. Don't be fooled.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-c799715c

· 2h ago

Nah, bro, there's nothing wrong with that, but how many people actually use open-source wallets... Most people just go for convenience, leaving security and all that aside for now.

View OriginalReply0

MEVSandwich

· 2h ago

Is it that old story again... Is it really that hard to find fully open-source? I think most people don't really care anyway, since centralized exchanges haven't collapsed, so what's the point of fussing?

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrier

· 2h ago

NGL, it's the same old story... The real question is how many people actually read the code. You're right, but no one does, and open-source wallets still get hacked.

View OriginalReply0