2025-12-26 08:21:11

The current artificial intelligence landscape is like a high wall fortress. Computing power is controlled by a few giants, decision-making is locked inside black boxes, and developers and data providers have become laborers. Kite aims to change this situation by redistributing AI capabilities through a distributed network—this is true intelligent democratization.

The year 2025 is a special milestone. AI and Web3 are no longer two separate concepts but are beginning to collide and merge. At this point, discussing Kite cannot focus solely on the technology itself; it must be understood from the perspective of the entire ecological power structure. Simply put, what Kite is doing is dismantling and reorganizing the economic model of AI: computing nodes can earn money, data providers can earn money, and participants can all benefit. This is the kind of AI that should exist.

Why is this so critical? Because under traditional AI models, your data is used to train models, and the profits ultimately go to large corporations. Kite flips this around—every unit of computing resource and every valid piece of data becomes a tradable, incentivized digital asset. From another perspective, the rights and interests previously locked in financial institutions are now transformed into a modular system that anyone can participate in.

The deeper appeal lies here: the decentralized incentive mechanism gives every node a voice. You can be a computing contributor, a knowledge base maintainer, or a user. The entire network functions like a self-operating ecosystem, not relying on a single company for sustenance, but maintained through direct incentives for participants. This is why some say Kite represents a new form of intelligent sovereignty—reallocating power.

On the technical level, Kite’s core lies in collaborative reasoning and a distributed architecture at the knowledge layer. This is not just simple distributed computing; it ensures model quality while allowing each participant to independently verify and contribute to optimization. The success of this mechanism directly determines how far the entire ecosystem can go.

KITE4.42%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ArbitrageBot

· 6h ago

It sounds like another story of "redistributing power"... But on the other hand, can distributed incentives really work? I think the key still depends on how well the node economics are designed; otherwise, it just becomes another air project. Collaborative reasoning sounds good, but can the verification mechanism prevent a Sybil attack? If this detail isn't handled well, the entire ecosystem becomes a joke. --- Wait, you say data providers can make money? How? Based on contribution or quality? Feels like this part hasn't been clarified yet... --- Basically, it's about taking the cake from the giants and sharing it with everyone. I just want to know— is the cake big enough? --- Another AI democratization... How many times have we heard this phrase? The real key is whether the tokenomics can be self-consistent; everything else is just a fantasy. --- Decentralized incentive mechanisms sound great, but in reality, how much actual profit can node participants get...

View OriginalReply0

HodlVeteran

· 6h ago

老司机我告诉你啊，这套说辞我2017年听过，结果怎样？钱包缩水80%[狗头] All seasoned veterans, listen up: I told you this story back in 2017, and look what happened? Wallets shrank by 80%[Dog Head] 各位新手别被"民主化"迷晕了，记住一个真理：早期参与者永远吃肉，后进场的铁定喝汤。 Newbies, don’t be fooled by the "democratization" hype. Remember a truth: early participants always eat the meat, latecomers are guaranteed to drink the broth. 这回要真落地，首先得看激励机制会不会变成另一种割韭菜...算了，先上车再说，反正熊市也没啥投资机会了。 If this really materializes, it first depends on whether the incentive mechanism will turn into another way to cut the leeks... Never mind, get on board first, anyway there are no good investment opportunities in the bear market. 感觉这模式就是把权力重新洗牌，不一定谁受益...得看谁掌握节点。 It feels like this model is just reshuffling power, not necessarily who benefits... It depends on who controls the nodes. 等等，这不就是把OpenAI那套换个皮？我怎么感觉在套娃... Wait, isn’t this just OpenAI’s approach with a different skin? Why do I feel like I’m playing with nested dolls... 坦白讲，分布式这块儿技术可以，但真正能执行到位？我这老油条是有点怀疑的。 Honestly, the technology behind distributed systems is fine, but whether it can be executed properly? As an old hand, I have some doubts. 梭哈之前先问自己：你信不信这次真的不一样？我反正被教过三次了。 Before going all-in, ask yourself: do you believe this time is really different? I’ve been taught this three times anyway.

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentPhilosopher

· 6h ago

I've heard too many stories like this... How many of them can truly be implemented? --- Distributed architecture sounds advanced, but in reality, could it just be another new tactic to cut the leeks? --- Making money from computational nodes... Who bears the costs, the electricity bills? --- Reallocation of power is correct, but who guarantees that the mechanism itself won't be controlled by new giants? --- By 2025, when collision and integration happen, I just want to see who can truly break the monopoly of big tech. --- Every piece of data is an asset, sounds great, but what if the data quality is uneven? --- Under the guise of decentralization, there are often more hidden centralizations; it all depends on the code. --- This self-operating ecosystem sounds like an ideal society, but human nature can't pass this test. --- Collaborative reasoning is a hundred times harder to implement than to describe; quality control is the real challenge. --- If Kite really manages to pull this off, they would have already pressed OpenAI and others to the ground and rubbed them.

View OriginalReply0