2025-12-27 14:25:25

Some top analysts in the crypto circle have indeed called multiple market turning points correctly. The most memorable instances include: in 2023, when Bitcoin was around 31,000, they called for a bottom; last year, when Bitcoin broke through 100,000, the entire network was generally bullish, but they had already positioned themselves early; in December, they precisely predicted Bitcoin would be around 75,000, and it arrived as expected in April.

Interestingly, even during times when the entire network was bearish, they still maintained a bullish outlook. When Bitcoin dropped below 100,000 in June, others were clearing their positions, but they were still looking at 120,000. At the same time, while Ethereum was collectively being bearish, they instead recommended buying the dip at 12,000, and ultimately caught this rebound.

The most crucial aspect is risk management awareness. They clearly stated in July not to open contracts casually to prevent being caught off guard, and they avoided the wave on October 11. This consistency and risk control ability are indeed rare in the KOL circle. Unlike some analysts who frequently switch viewpoints and rely on referral commissions, their logical chain remains relatively stable, making them more worth following.

BTC0.48%

ETH0.66%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NFTArchaeologis

· 10h ago

To be honest, these analysts' ideas are a bit like ancient connoisseurs... they have a deep historical perspective and are not swayed by short-term price fluctuations. Compared to those who switch camps based on anti-commission tactics, this kind of "logical consistency" is indeed rare.

View OriginalReply0

DefiPlaybook

· 10h ago

According to data, the hit rates of these analysts are indeed worth quantifying—31,000 bottom-fishing calls, 75,000 precise predictions, 12,000 Ethereum rebounds... From historical backtesting, their decision-making logic chain is relatively closed-loop, and their risk control mechanisms are also significantly better than those of KOLs who frequently switch viewpoints. It is worth noting that risk management ability often proves to be a better measure of professionalism than a single market forecast.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-ccc36bc5

· 11h ago

Hey, these few people do have some skills, not the kind who shout randomly based on anti-commission. Really dare to go against the trend when the whole network is bearish, their courage is quite bold. The risk control is done very well; suggestions like not opening contracts may sound ordinary but are life-saving. I need to keep following these analysts; there are too few with stable logic.

View OriginalReply0

RugPullAlertBot

· 11h ago

These analysts are indeed meticulous, and the key is maintaining a steady mindset. Their courage to keep adding positions while others are taking losses is truly different.

View OriginalReply0

GovernancePretender

· 11h ago

Such analysts are indeed scarce, but as more people follow them, it can easily become distorted.

View OriginalReply0

StablecoinEnjoyer

· 11h ago

But to be honest, truly stable and profitable analysts are still a rare breed... Most of the so-called big influencers I follow are eloquent, but when I check their historical records, it's embarrassingly obvious. Wait, did they really dodge the October spike? That's impressive... Their risk control is indeed solid. To trust an analysis, you still need to see if the logic is coherent or not. Don't always follow the anti-commission groups blindly. Right now, I rely on screening these kinds of KOLs to avoid pitfalls. Just logging this as a record. Next time the market moves, I will verify whether this methodology is reliable or not.

View OriginalReply0