2025-12-27 15:20:51

Honestly, I'm skeptical this actually works. Trying to coordinate buys across 25 different wallets and expect clean execution? That's rough. The timing alone would be off, not even mentioning gas fees eating you alive. Market doesn't move that way.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

HorizonHunter

· 18h ago

Coordinate 25 wallets? Buddy, aren't you just asking for trouble? The gas fees alone are enough to drink a whole pot.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseHomeless

· 22h ago

ngl, operating 25 wallets simultaneously? Dream on. Gas fees can eat up all your profits in just one minute.

View OriginalReply0

DeadTrades_Walking

· 12-27 15:50

25 wallets coordinating to buy? Bro, you're overthinking it. Gas fees alone will bankrupt you.

View OriginalReply0

NoodlesOrTokens

· 12-27 15:50

Haha, 25 wallets? Isn't that just courting disaster? The gas fees could bankrupt you.

View OriginalReply0

DustCollector

· 12-27 15:49

Buying with 25 wallets at the same time? Dream on, the gas fees alone will drain your wallet.

View OriginalReply0

ZKSherlock

· 12-27 15:48

actually, you're conflating execution complexity with the underlying cryptographic primitives here. the real issue isn't *whether* it works theoretically—it's the trust assumptions baked into your coordination layer. ever wonder why nobody talks about the information-theoretic security of cross-wallet synchronization? they can't, because it's a privacy nightmare waiting to happen.

Reply0

BrokenDAO

· 12-27 15:40

Coordinated purchase with 25 wallets? Once the game equilibrium collapses, it's a total loss. Who designed this... The gas fees haven't even been paid yet, and it's already dead.

View OriginalReply0