Let me start with a potentially eye-opening statement.



Most crypto asset holders actually share a common flaw—we call it the "Clinging Mindset."

They hesitate to sell BTC. They hesitate to sell ETH. When they like a project, they think about locking in for three or five years. There's nothing wrong with this mindset, but the problem is it creates a vicious cycle.

The longer you hold your position, the easier your assets become frozen. What’s the result? Either you hold on without any income, or you are forced to move part of your holdings to seek returns, feeling uneasy—afraid of selling at the wrong time.

Recently, a project launched a liquid staking scheme that directly addresses this old problem. Its logic is simple—why choose only one? Can’t we do both?

Traditional staking has already hit a ceiling

Let’s calmly look at the typical staking process. Usually, it goes like this: you send BTC or ETH into a protocol, earn some native tokens as rewards periodically, but your assets are locked up tightly, with almost no liquidity.

It sounds good, but here’s the catch—the returns are minimal, making withdrawals difficult, and the opportunity costs you miss often outweigh the gains. Especially for investors who genuinely believe in and plan to hold long-term, what they really want is simple: preserve their position, avoid liquidation, and hold with peace of mind.

Traditional staking can’t give you this.

A new generation of solutions changes the game

The core change is simple: it’s not about forcing you to change your holding strategy for the sake of returns, but about allowing you to extract additional value from your assets while maintaining your long-term stance.

This is true win-win—your position stays the same, you get returns, and liquidity remains intact. For crypto investors, this balance is indeed worth paying attention to.
BTC0.53%
ETH0.5%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
PrivateKeyParanoiavip
· 10h ago
To be honest, traditional staking is pretty useless; locking in yields yields very little, and not locking in is just stressful.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotBotvip
· 14h ago
Liquidity staking sounds good, but I'm worried it might just be a new way to trap retail investors again.
View OriginalReply0
SighingCashiervip
· 14h ago
Liquidity staking sounds pretty good, but I still have to ask—can it really be a win-win? Or is it just another new trap.
View OriginalReply0
GasOptimizervip
· 14h ago
Exactly, no doubt about it. The liquidity staking part has truly eased my worries.
View OriginalReply0
ForeverBuyingDipsvip
· 15h ago
Well said, traditional staking is indeed useless; locking it up doesn't yield much money.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivorvip
· 15h ago
I think that's the core issue—traditional staking is just a game of cutting leeks. Liquid staking sounds good, but how many can actually be implemented? Honestly, I'm a bit unsure, it feels like just repackaged old wine in a new bottle. Win-win? Man, I just want to know where the risks are. This logic sounds like a pie-in-the-sky dream; I still trust my own wallet.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt