When it comes to the randomness system in games, everyone knows—blind box surprises, dungeon loot drops, arena wins and losses—all depend on it. But once you enter the world of blockchain games, this setup changes its flavor. Players are always pondering: Is this randomness truly random? Are project teams manipulating behind the scenes? In simple terms, the "fairness crisis" of blockchain games stems from this very issue.



This problem may seem minor, but it actually determines whether blockchain games can truly shake off traditional gaming. As both a player and a developer, I know this all too well—if the trust system collapses, the industry has no future. Only after delving into a new solution did I realize what it means to fundamentally change the rules of the game.

The core idea isn't complicated: don't let game developers have the final say behind the scenes; instead, transfer the power of randomness generation to the entire on-chain community, where everyone can see and verify. It sounds simple, but the real challenge is—how to ensure the randomness is sufficiently unpredictable, unmanipulable, and unguessable, while also being fast, cheap, and not holding things up?

The answer is a combination of techniques. First, discard easily hackable methods like block timestamps or hash values. Instead, embed a "random number generator" at the network layer. Its operation is as follows: every so often (around each block), a random group of verifiers is selected from the entire network, and they each generate a secret digital fragment. These fragments are then aggregated and combined on-chain to produce the final random seed. The entire process is fully transparent; no single participant can know the result in advance or alter the numbers. In this way, fairness shifts from mere promises to verifiable facts.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
UnluckyMinervip
· 14h ago
It's a nice idea, but I still want to see the actual implementation before commenting.
View OriginalReply0
ConfusedWhalevip
· 14h ago
Basically, it's just the crap from the anti-chain gaming project team. Finally, someone has figured it out.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinArbitrageurvip
· 14h ago
honestly, the 51% attack vector on validator collusion still keeps me up at night ngl. like yeah, vrf on-chain is *chef's kiss* theoretically, but what's the actual slashing penalty mechanism here? because if we're talking basis points of economic security...
Reply0
liquidation_watchervip
· 14h ago
It sounds great, but I still want to see real data. Will those validators collude secretly? On-chain transparency ≠ unmanipulable, we need to test it thoroughly.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)