A U.S. congressman recently shared thoughts on what Bitcoin was truly meant to be. He emphasized that Bitcoin wasn't designed to be just another illiquid or inflating asset. The real promise was something different—a permission-less, peer-to-peer payment system where users could transact freely. What made it revolutionary? No middleman could control your access to your own funds. You held the keys, literally. That's the fundamental difference between Bitcoin and traditional finance. You could move your money without asking permission from any bank or institution. It's not about price speculation; it's about reclaiming financial sovereignty.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
4 Likes
Reward
4
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NFTRegretful
· 18h ago
After all these years, politicians are finally starting to get it, but to be honest, BC has been saying this repeatedly for a long time.
View OriginalReply0
RetailTherapist
· 18h ago
This guy is right, but in reality? Most people are still trading cryptocurrencies to make quick money...
View OriginalReply0
ILCollector
· 19h ago
Someone finally spoke the truth; this is the original intention of Bitcoin.
A U.S. congressman recently shared thoughts on what Bitcoin was truly meant to be. He emphasized that Bitcoin wasn't designed to be just another illiquid or inflating asset. The real promise was something different—a permission-less, peer-to-peer payment system where users could transact freely. What made it revolutionary? No middleman could control your access to your own funds. You held the keys, literally. That's the fundamental difference between Bitcoin and traditional finance. You could move your money without asking permission from any bank or institution. It's not about price speculation; it's about reclaiming financial sovereignty.