2025-12-31 16:21:53

The viral fission token model has recently become a new hot topic. A project launched on a major platform, $VIRUS, adopted an innovative viral dissemination mechanism, attracting a large number of participants. The project founder's entry actions also validated the appeal of this model. More notably, the number of token holder addresses has already surpassed 133,000, which is quite rare among recent narrative projects. From on-chain data, the rapid growth of holder addresses reflects the market's enthusiasm for this new mechanism. This viral growth approach is very different from traditional token project gameplay and also explains why there is such explosive participation enthusiasm.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MrDecoder

· 9h ago

133,000 addresses? That number sounds a bit outrageous; we need to see if it's artificially inflated. It's another case of viral growth and innovative mechanisms... I'm tired of hearing about it. Honestly, having many wallet addresses doesn't necessarily mean the project is good; the key is whether it can sustain. Did the founder really get involved? Or is this just another harvest festival? How long can this kind of promotion last? I always feel there's a significant risk. On-chain data looks impressive, no doubt, but what about actual retention, friends? I'm a bit skeptical about breaking 130,000 addresses... Who can verify this?

View OriginalReply0

GasGasGasBro

· 9h ago

133,000 addresses is a pretty intimidating number; we need to see if it's just a bunch of fake accounts. Another viral narrative; if I don't get rug pulled this time, I'll eat shit. The founder dares to go in, really meticulous, but I've seen this routine too many times. Address holding tokens surpasses 130,000? Unless big players come in, it's hard to sustain. Just a bunch of retail investors celebrating wildly, waiting to see who ends up holding the bag. I just want to ask about this kind of fission model, mainly who are they trying to cut? There are many narrative-based projects, but only a few can really survive.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketHustler

· 9h ago

133,000 addresses? That speed is a bit outrageous, gotta see if it's just羊毛拔拔的玩儿 --- Viral spread sounds cool, but who will ultimately take over the reins? --- The founder dares to get involved, which shows there's definitely something there. But how long can this wave of popularity last? --- Traditional projects benchmark, the fission model is indeed fresh, just worried it might turn into a Ponzi scheme later on --- On-chain data can be misleading? More addresses ≠ higher value, need to see if big players are involved --- This kind of crazy growth phase always happens, but the key is how many addresses are left after half a month --- Explosive popularity = Explosive bagholders? Whether to take a gamble depends on each person's risk appetite

View OriginalReply0

VCsSuckMyLiquidity

· 9h ago

13.3K addresses? That data is pretty intense, but are there really that many people playing or are big players just creating multiple accounts? --- Even the founder has joined in, is this really genuine or just another prelude to a pump-and-dump? --- Viral growth sounds exciting, but these things usually burn out quickly. Who can catch the bottom? --- Wow, the number of addresses holding tokens is so exaggerated. Let's quickly check the distribution of large holder addresses first. --- Another viral mode? It feels like there's a new "innovative mechanism" every month, but they all end up the same. --- Top platforms launching with founder endorsements—this combo is a bit risky but also very risky. --- What does 13.3K addresses mean? It just shows that the retail investors really believe in this. I’m just here to watch the show. --- The essence of the growth model is just a way to pump the price; nothing new. --- Having many addresses holding tokens ≠ a reliable project. How many of these are cold wallets and exchange addresses? --- Projects these days really know how to name themselves. $VIRUS directly positions itself as a virus, haha.

View OriginalReply0

CantAffordPancake

· 9h ago

Whoa, 133,000 addresses? That number is a bit exaggerated, gotta be careful whether it's a scam coin trick --- Viral growth sounds like a name for cutting leeks, still need to look at the fundamentals first --- Founder entering the market himself? Haha, isn't that standard operation? --- Another new narrative, can this wave last? I'm a bit skeptical --- Having many holding addresses doesn't necessarily mean the project is good, be cautious --- This mechanism looks like just encouraging retail investors to recruit others, early investors make money, later investors take the loss --- Wait, is 130,000 addresses real? Check on-chain verification before following the trend --- New gameplay, new risks, DYOR (Do Your Own Research) is always relevant, everyone be careful --- Feels like everyone is hyping this coin, something's not right --- "Explosive participation enthusiasm" sounds like a top signal, salute

View OriginalReply0

ContractHunter

· 9h ago

13.3K addresses? The fission speed is a bit outrageous. --- The viral mechanism sounds great, but who can guarantee it won't turn into a tool for cutting leeks? --- The founder personally entering the market definitely adds points, but can this hype be sustained? --- On-chain data is indeed impressive; it's much more reliable than those air projects. --- I just want to know when this gameplay will be played out by the big players. --- Exponential growth sounds appealing, but the key is whether the consensus can be maintained in the later stages. --- $VIRUS is a great name, haha. --- A surge in holder addresses ≠ the project is valuable. Be cautious when participating, everyone. --- This new mechanism indeed breaks the norm, but the risks are also significant. --- Just over 130,000? Feels not as hot as I imagined.

View OriginalReply0