#数字资产动态追踪 $UNI $ZEC $AT



A certain DEX has just announced a major upgrade—the launch of a 1 million token burn plan, backed by a $600 million ecosystem adjustment.

The core changes are threefold: First, 10%-25% of the protocol revenue will be automatically used to buy back and burn tokens, directly linking business growth with token scarcity. The more active the trading volume, the faster the burns. Second, revenue from gas fees on the self-built chain will also be incorporated into this closed loop, ensuring that each user’s cost ultimately enhances the token’s value. Third, the valuation logic has been completely reconstructed—from a simple governance tool to an income-generating asset with cash flow. Based on current revenue levels, the implied PE ratio is approximately 12-24 times.

Why is this plan worth paying attention to? Because it is no longer a temporary move for the ecosystem, but a real response to the excess issuance problem of the past few years through actual buybacks. The voting approval rate is 97%, indicating strong community support for this direction.

When the fee switch is truly activated, the token will form a self-reinforcing market performance in two ways: accelerating deflation and scarcity during upward trends, and automatic support during declines. This kind of bidirectional feedback mechanism is still relatively rare in the DeFi space.

The question is, can this model bring the token back to the top of market capitalization? Will the valuation logic in the DeFi sector be rewritten as a result? It seems that this is the truly worth-discussing point.
UNI-4.25%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NeverVoteOnDAOvip
· 21h ago
A 97% voting rate is quite impressive; I'm just worried that when the actual fee switch is turned on, it might turn out to be just on paper. Buyback and burn is an old trick; the key still depends on whether trading volume can truly pick up. Gas fee redistribution... sounds good, but I don't know how active the self-built chain is right now. This PE ratio of 12-24 times is based on current revenue, but if growth stalls later, it could easily be a reality check. Top market cap? Don't think too much about it for now. Just hold steady and avoid falling out of the top 100. The double-sided support logic has been heard too many times; the token price still depends on hype to sustain it.
View OriginalReply0
HashBardvip
· 21h ago
ngl, the narrative arc here is kinda perfect... 97% feels like that moment before the plot twist tho lmk when reality hits
Reply0
RamenDeFiSurvivorvip
· 21h ago
Destroying tokens sounds satisfying, but the actual switch to open expenses still has to wait. Don't celebrate too early. --- A 97% success rate is indeed impressive, but I wonder if it can be truly executed to the end. --- A $600 million ecosystem adjustment sounds like a remedy for over-issuance. Can this turn the tide? --- PE ratio of only 12-24? It's indeed cheaper compared to pure governance tokens, but whether the market recognizes it is another matter. --- Including gas fees into the destruction cycle? The logic is clear, but the key is still having enough user volume to support it. --- The self-reinforcing mechanism sounds good, but in actual operation, will it be as ideal as expected or will reality be quite different? --- If this buyback and burn model can really bring the market cap back to the top, DeFi will need a major bull market to support it.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)