At 3 a.m., staring at the latest Federal Reserve announcement, I laughed—$16 billion in liquidity injections, a scene that seems to replay every few years. As a market observer who has long studied liquidity indicators, I am increasingly convinced of one rule: changes in liquidity are like tides, cyclically driving the ups and downs of crypto assets, and the Federal Reserve is the switch operator.
**How Liquidity Dominates the Market**
On December 1st, the Federal Reserve officially ended its quantitative tightening plan. At the same time, they injected $13.5 billion into the overnight repurchase agreements of the U.S. banking system. How big is this number? It’s the second-largest single injection since the COVID-19 pandemic began, even more aggressive than the peaks during the internet bubble era.
Fundstrat analyst Tom Lee has an interesting point: in years when liquidity increases, risk-on assets always perform the strongest. This perfectly explains why Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are so sensitive to every move of the Federal Reserve—they are inherently risk assets, with an almost instinctive sense for liquidity.
Look at what happened at the end of November. The Fed signaled a rate cut, the market immediately responded, and cryptocurrencies collectively surged—Bitcoin’s single-day increase easily broke 4%. This is not a coincidence but proof of the increasingly close connection between traditional finance and crypto markets.
**How Money Flows into the Crypto Market**
The Federal Reserve turned on the faucet of liquidity, but how does this money ultimately flow into assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum? I’ve observed three main pathways at work.
First is the expansion of bank credit. After the Fed injected liquidity into the banking system, banks had more money to lend. When banks start lending actively, borrowing becomes easier, and this money eventually flows into venture capital, hedge funds, and retail investors. These funds flow into higher-risk asset classes—cryptocurrencies naturally become part of this.
Second is the asset price effect. When liquidity is abundant, valuations of various assets tend to rise. Investors seek higher-yield investments, and cryptocurrencies, with their high volatility and potential for high returns, become key targets.
The third transmission pathway is a shift in psychological expectations. The release of liquidity itself reinforces market optimism. When investors see the Fed releasing liquidity, they anticipate the economy will improve in the future, and risk assets will rise. This very expectation drives the crypto market higher.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainFoodie
· 14h ago
yo this is basically the fed printing a michelin-star menu and expecting us not to notice the inflation in every dish... liquidity flowing like fine wine but somebody's gonna get intoxicated, ngl
Reply0
ExpectationFarmer
· 14h ago
Still watching the Federal Reserve announcement at 3 a.m.? Dude, are you serious? I just opened it and burst out laughing at the 16 billion.
I can memorize the Fed's operations: injecting liquidity → crazy crypto market → I lose everything, cycle repeats.
Basically, it's just a money-printing machine. When it turns, the coins in our hands appreciate. The problem is, when can you sell to secure your gains?
Those three transmission paths sound reasonable, but the most painful one is the psychological expectation—it's all just retail investors taking turns to buy the dip.
Does history really have to repeat itself? Or will the Fed hike interest rates again this time, and we get harvested once more?
View OriginalReply0
FloorPriceNightmare
· 14h ago
Here it comes again. When the Federal Reserve pumps liquidity, we make money. How long can this game go on?
---
Staying up until 3 a.m. watching the market, I really respect the guy's execution.
---
Basically, it's printing money → banks lending → retail investors taking over BTC. Why does this routine never fail?
---
Saying liquidity is sensitive sounds nice, but actually it's the Federal Reserve manipulating us.
---
A shift in psychological expectations? It's just buying the dip when prices go up—don't make it so academic.
---
$13.5 billion sounds impressive, but why does only a few thousand dollars actually flow into my account?
---
Can we really get some gains this time, brothers, or will we just become the bagholders again?
---
How credible is Tom Lee? Can history really prove anything?
View OriginalReply0
RektHunter
· 14h ago
People are awake at three in the morning, the Fed's liquidity injection is a signal, and we're all in.
Money will definitely flow into risk assets unless there's something wrong with the brain.
Wait, this logic is all over the place, but is it really that simple...
The market reacts to every word from the Fed, it's hilarious.
Here we go again, the liquidity cycle theory is old news.
Bank lending, asset appreciation, psychological expectations—none can be missing, the difficulty lies in the timing.
The part about changing expectations is correct; retail investors fall for this psychological suggestion.
Is 16 billion enough this time? I doubt it; we're still far from the all-time high.
The most ridiculous part is that people start to dream and celebrate even before the money hits their hands.
At 3 a.m., staring at the latest Federal Reserve announcement, I laughed—$16 billion in liquidity injections, a scene that seems to replay every few years. As a market observer who has long studied liquidity indicators, I am increasingly convinced of one rule: changes in liquidity are like tides, cyclically driving the ups and downs of crypto assets, and the Federal Reserve is the switch operator.
**How Liquidity Dominates the Market**
On December 1st, the Federal Reserve officially ended its quantitative tightening plan. At the same time, they injected $13.5 billion into the overnight repurchase agreements of the U.S. banking system. How big is this number? It’s the second-largest single injection since the COVID-19 pandemic began, even more aggressive than the peaks during the internet bubble era.
Fundstrat analyst Tom Lee has an interesting point: in years when liquidity increases, risk-on assets always perform the strongest. This perfectly explains why Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are so sensitive to every move of the Federal Reserve—they are inherently risk assets, with an almost instinctive sense for liquidity.
Look at what happened at the end of November. The Fed signaled a rate cut, the market immediately responded, and cryptocurrencies collectively surged—Bitcoin’s single-day increase easily broke 4%. This is not a coincidence but proof of the increasingly close connection between traditional finance and crypto markets.
**How Money Flows into the Crypto Market**
The Federal Reserve turned on the faucet of liquidity, but how does this money ultimately flow into assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum? I’ve observed three main pathways at work.
First is the expansion of bank credit. After the Fed injected liquidity into the banking system, banks had more money to lend. When banks start lending actively, borrowing becomes easier, and this money eventually flows into venture capital, hedge funds, and retail investors. These funds flow into higher-risk asset classes—cryptocurrencies naturally become part of this.
Second is the asset price effect. When liquidity is abundant, valuations of various assets tend to rise. Investors seek higher-yield investments, and cryptocurrencies, with their high volatility and potential for high returns, become key targets.
The third transmission pathway is a shift in psychological expectations. The release of liquidity itself reinforces market optimism. When investors see the Fed releasing liquidity, they anticipate the economy will improve in the future, and risk assets will rise. This very expectation drives the crypto market higher.