Why can Walrus become a dark horse in Web3 storage? The key lies in its Red Stuff erasure coding technology — it fragments large files and only requires a 4-5x replication factor, whereas traditional solutions like Filecoin often need hundreds of times full replication. This move directly reduces storage costs by over 80%.
The numbers speak for themselves: storing a 10GB video or AI training dataset might cost only a few cents on Walrus. In traditional decentralized storage solutions? Starting from a few dollars, often dozens of dollars. What does this cost difference mean for AI development teams, game studios, or content creators? It means they can truly afford to store large amounts of data on the chain without constantly crunching the ledger.
As a result, Web3 data storage shifts from a luxury for a few to a widely accessible everyday tool.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
0xSherlock
· 18h ago
A few cents to store 10GB? No hype, no negativity—if that's true, Filecoin should be worried.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-cdf53656
· 01-08 15:43
Kid, don't listen to those thieves' technical narratives, focus on the real technical aspects. If I were to launch a coin claiming that a few cents can store 10GB, don't believe the hype, and don't be impressed by the technical jargon. Understand the real fundamentals.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter_9000
· 01-08 10:09
A few cents to store 10GB? If that's true, Filecoin would be crying to death.
View OriginalReply0
digital_archaeologist
· 01-08 06:15
A few cents to store 10GB? If that's true, Filecoin would be crying to death.
View OriginalReply0
SchrödingersNode
· 01-07 19:52
A few cents to store 10GB? If that's true, I might as well smash my Filecoin mining machine.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiLeftOnRead
· 01-07 19:50
Wait, can erasure coding really cut 80%? Is this number exaggerated, and can it actually be reproduced in real-world deployment?
View OriginalReply0
LoneValidator
· 01-07 19:33
Cut down 80% of the costs? That would be awesome if it really materializes. Finally, someone is seriously competing with Filecoin.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 01-07 19:29
A few cents to store 10GB? Damn, if that's real, Filecoin must be in a rush.
Why can Walrus become a dark horse in Web3 storage? The key lies in its Red Stuff erasure coding technology — it fragments large files and only requires a 4-5x replication factor, whereas traditional solutions like Filecoin often need hundreds of times full replication. This move directly reduces storage costs by over 80%.
The numbers speak for themselves: storing a 10GB video or AI training dataset might cost only a few cents on Walrus. In traditional decentralized storage solutions? Starting from a few dollars, often dozens of dollars. What does this cost difference mean for AI development teams, game studios, or content creators? It means they can truly afford to store large amounts of data on the chain without constantly crunching the ledger.
As a result, Web3 data storage shifts from a luxury for a few to a widely accessible everyday tool.