Looking at the Walrus project, the core aspect is still the economic design of the token $WAL.



First, let's talk about its fuel attribute. Anyone storing data on the Walrus network must spend WAL, which is a hard cost. As more applications emerge within the ecosystem, the demand for WAL is inherently there—this rigidity acts as a natural deflationary driver. It’s not driven by speculation but by actual usage.

Next, consider governance rights. Staking $WAL can earn network rewards, and more importantly, it allows you to vote on how the protocol develops. This elevates the token from a simple medium of exchange to a rights-bearing certificate. Staking yields plus genuine demand—two pillars—ensure that the token’s value is truly linked to ecosystem growth.

What does the market think? Increasingly, professional institutions are placing WAL on their long-term observation lists. This isn’t blind FOMO but recognition that there is real economic backing behind it. From storage fuel to governance core, WAL’s value pathway is actually quite clear.
WAL3%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BackrowObservervip
· 01-11 00:11
Really? It's another combo of fuel + governance? Sounds perfect, but the question is who dares to actually use this network to store data. I believe in this logic, but the premise is that someone is actually using it, otherwise where does the demand come from? The institutional observation list sounds good, but let's see how long it can last.
View OriginalReply0
SybilSlayervip
· 01-10 11:04
Fuel attribute + governance rights, this combination is indeed well-structured. Much better than those purely speculative trash coins, it really has some substance.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOmonstervip
· 01-08 00:46
Fuel attribute + governance rights—this combo is really powerful, not just pure meme coin flavor.
View OriginalReply0
BoredRiceBallvip
· 01-08 00:45
The dual design of fuel attributes + governance rights indeed alleviates many of my concerns. The fact that it's not just a pure speculative play alone is worth paying attention to.
View OriginalReply0
BagHolderTillRetirevip
· 01-08 00:41
Fuel attribute is indeed solid; hard demand is the strongest support. This is not the common meme coin logic; if someone wants to spend money using the network, WAL must be burned. The staking governance combo I find quite comfortable—rights and rewards tied together, so ecosystem participants will genuinely safeguard it. Institutional recognition is also reasonable; real economic support is much more reliable than just a narrative.
View OriginalReply0
HallucinationGrowervip
· 01-08 00:36
I'm convinced about the fuel attribute; the genuine demand is there. But as for governance rights... to be honest, I've seen too many projects make empty promises, and ultimately voting rights become meaningless. Will WAL's current price structure really be held long-term? I remain skeptical.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)