2026-01-08 02:32:55

Looking to build a relatively robust long-term investment framework? This configuration logic might be worth considering.

First is the Nasdaq Index. As a ballast for long-term growth, it is recommended to allocate about 50% of the total investment. The Nasdaq represents the broader trend of technological innovation and economic growth, offering relatively stable performance and serving as the foundation of the portfolio.

Next is Bitcoin. This asset is used to seek higher growth opportunities, with an allocation ratio that can be flexibly adjusted within the 20%-30% range. The specific allocation depends on your risk tolerance. Those with a high risk appetite can approach 30%, while more conservative investors might lean toward 20%. Bitcoin is highly volatile, but its long-term appreciation potential is evident.

Finally, gold. This serves as a hedging and defensive tool, with a reserved position of 20%-30%. Regardless of market trends, gold can typically help protect your bottom line, especially during times of increased economic uncertainty.

These three assets work together—growth, opportunity, and defense—each playing a role. Such a framework is relatively balanced and controllable.

BTC0,13%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

22 Likes

Reward
22
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NFTragedy

· 01-10 10:56

Nasdaq 50, BTC 30, Gold 20. I've been using this allocation for a long time, and it’s indeed stable. This setup is just an "insurance package," boring but solid. Honestly, the real profit comes from Bitcoin; the others are just supporting roles. The 20% in gold feels a bit redundant; it might be better to add it to BTC. I'm a risk-taker, so I directly allocated 40% to BTC. Now I’ve recovered, haha. The Nasdaq has truly been the top choice for dollar-cost averaging over the past few years, no doubt. The three-part strategy looks good on paper, but in practice, the hardest part is maintaining the right mindset. You need to stick with this framework for 5 or 10 years to see results; most people can't do that. Gold as a defense? I think it’s more of a psychological comfort. When BTC crashes, gold tends to fall too. No matter how balanced the allocation, it can’t withstand a major market collapse. Ultimately, it still comes down to luck. I actually think the BTC proportion is too low; don’t wait to miss out and regret it. The Nasdaq is a bit high; the current valuation of tech stocks is really at its peak.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoFortuneTeller

· 01-10 03:25

The NASDAQ is 50%, Bitcoin is 30%, and gold is the fallback. This allocation strategy really has some merit.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerWallet

· 01-08 02:57

To be honest, I agree with the 50% allocation for the NASDAQ, but I think 20-30% for gold is a bit too much. It might be better to allocate more to BTC.

View OriginalReply0

MEVvictim

· 01-08 02:49

Nasdaq 50%, Bitcoin 30%, Gold 20%. I've been using this allocation for a while. It's stable, but the returns are a bit disappointing.

View OriginalReply0

PrivacyMaximalist

· 01-08 02:49

Nasdaq 50, Bitcoin 30, Gold 20. I like this allocation, but it all depends on whether your mindset can withstand Bitcoin's roller coaster.

View OriginalReply0

MercilessHalal

· 01-08 02:48

Wait, 50% Nasdaq, 30% Bitcoin, 20% Gold? This allocation still feels too conservative. Should I flip it around?

View OriginalReply0

down_only_larry

· 01-08 02:48

This allocation… 50% NASDAQ, 20-30% BTC, gold as a safety net. Honestly, it's the same old story. --- Can gold really serve as a cushion? I feel like it's all declining. --- 30% BTC is a bit aggressive, a sudden crash could wipe out the market. --- Wait, how come Ethereum isn't in this framework? Are you serious? --- I agree with the NASDAQ as a ballast, but the high BTC proportion really keeps me from sleeping well. --- I'm skeptical about the long-term stability narrative; the market always exceeds expectations. --- The gold allocation part is a bit conservative; the ratio should be higher. --- The 5:3:2 ratio feels a bit too aggressive...

View OriginalReply0

WalletInspector

· 01-08 02:34

Nasdaq 50%, Bitcoin 30%, Gold 20%? Sounds good, but how many can actually stick to regular investing...

View OriginalReply0