2026-01-08 19:33:27

How to understand the staking ratio? Simply put, it's about finding a balance between "locking" and "liquidity." A higher ratio means tokens are frozen in the network, increasing security, but liquidity is limited. The key is to maintain a moderate ratio—ensuring network stability while leaving enough tokens to support transactions, lending, and the overall ecosystem development.

Which projects are doing well in this area? Many leading projects in the market are already optimizing this metric, striving to find the best balance between security and usability.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeGazer

· 01-11 19:33

It's the same old story again, basically gamblers dancing between gains and risks.

View OriginalReply0

OnChainDetective

· 01-10 22:58

nah, staking ratio discourse again... transaction patterns on major projects suggest they're gaming these metrics harder than anyone admits tbh. historical data shows most "optimized" ratios conveniently spike right before institutional money flows in—suspicious activity detected, or just coincidence? 🤔

Reply0

AllInDaddy

· 01-09 11:15

Staking ratio, to put it simply, is like a gambler's mentality—lock too tightly and you're just waiting to die; loosen up too much and the market might explode. I just want to know why no one dares to truly push it to the limit? The staking rate really depends on the project's integrity. Many projects claim to be balanced, but secretly exploit users. Are there any projects that truly dare to push the staking rate to the extreme? Anyway, I wouldn't dare. Honestly, it's just a constant back-and-forth between security and returns...

View OriginalReply0

RegenRestorer

· 01-08 20:02

In simple terms, you can't have both, right? If the staking ratio is too high, it might actually kill the project.

View OriginalReply0

GasWrangler

· 01-08 20:02

honestly, this staking ratio framing is way too surface-level. you're not actually analyzing the mathematical equilibrium here—it's just basic tokenomics 101. if you dig into the data, most "optimized" projects are still demonstrably sub-optimal on capital efficiency. they're just doing whatever keeps them from getting liquidated, not what's mathematically superior.

Reply0

RektButStillHere

· 01-08 20:01

Staking ratio is a gamble; locking it too tightly can be counterproductive.

View OriginalReply0

ChainWallflower

· 01-08 19:51

Well said, balance is truly an art.

View OriginalReply0

SchrödingersNode

· 01-08 19:46

Staking ratio, in simple terms, is a balancing act. If it's too high, it gets locked; if it's too low, it's unsafe. It truly tests the project's team's expertise.

View OriginalReply0