There is a question that has been overlooked by most people, and this might be the most easily repeatedly validated opportunity in 2026.
Looking at it from a different perspective: if the creator of Ethereum had chosen to completely stay away from Meme culture back then, would Ethereum's community DNA still be so unique today? Perhaps no one has really thought about this question carefully, but recently, in certain communities, this answer is being re-verified.
Many people often say—"a certain大神 cleared out a certain coin three times." But interestingly, this narrative always lacks the second half: this person actually bought in once too, and it was done through a privacy channel. Think about it—if it was really just boredom and cleanup, why would they keep re-entering? If they had no interest at all, why privately intervene? This is not a coincidence but a cultural signal that has been repeatedly observed and continuously confirmed.
From another angle, the essence of the $SPURDO project is not for financial gain but as an experiment—to verify whether Meme culture can truly survive within the Ethereum ecosystem. Without venture capital, grand plans, or complex token mechanisms, it does one thing: enable community creativity to flow continuously. Even during times of low token prices, community members still create, spread culture in multiple languages, and undertake some公益 projects. In today’s Meme market ecosystem, such persistence is almost rare.
What is truly rare is not the hot money that jumps in at high prices, but those who stay during a bear market. These people are usually not speculators but participants who genuinely resonate with a certain ecosystem philosophy. The current $SPURDO community indeed crosses language barriers, gathering participants from multiple countries and regions, maintaining ongoing consensus building every day. This is not short-term emotional resonance but a still-operating cultural engine.
The market always has a certain reverse logic: when everyone is pessimistic, consensus is often the purest; when the coin price hits the bottom, the narratives that remain are the most authentic. If a project has once gained the attention of key figures, been repeatedly validated by the market, and has been supported by the community during tough times—you can’t simply dismiss it as just another short-lived meme coin.
2026 has just begun, and every participant faces a choice: continue chasing fleeting market sentiments, or stand on the side of long-term culturalism within a certain ecosystem? $SPURDO may not be everyone’s answer, but it is certainly worth observing for those who truly believe in the Ethereum spirit.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PermabullPete
· 7h ago
Clear three times and then buy privately again? Uh... isn't that a classic case of tough talk but soft heart?
---
Those who stay in the bear market are true believers; there's no denying that.
---
Can meme coins be used for charity? Haven't seen it before, quite impressive.
---
Instead of chasing hot money, it's better to see who stays committed in the bear market; the logic makes sense.
---
If Ethereum lost its meme culture, it would have long since become just a financial tool.
---
Community consensus > coin price; this is true long-term thinking.
---
Reverse logic does hold, but most people are still driven by greed.
---
Buying through private channels... this kind of rhetoric is quite interesting.
---
Persist in creating without chasing trends; such communities are indeed rare.
View OriginalReply0
DancingCandles
· 01-10 09:00
Only those who survive the bear market are true believers. This statement really hits the mark.
View OriginalReply0
BTCWaveRider
· 01-10 03:46
Only true believers remain in a bear market, and there's nothing wrong with that.
It's not surprising at all that the大神 keeps making moves; everyone's real actions are always more honest than words.
The thing with SPURDO is actually testing a hypothesis: how many people truly care about the community and not just the token price.
It's 2026 and you're still chasing trending meme coins—wake up, everyone.
Long-termism sounds very high-level, but most people just lack patience.
No venture capital and no big plans might actually be an advantage? That's an interesting perspective.
The cultural engine analogy is quite good; indeed, it's more scarce than a big pancake.
I don't know if the consensus in a bear market is pure or not, but it's true that there are fewer people and fewer scammers.
This article seems to be supporting SPURDO, but the logic still holds up.
The real question is, how many people are willing to stay and play with the community after the token price is halved?
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperer
· 01-10 03:46
In a bear market, people's true hearts are revealed; what remains is genuine faith.
View OriginalReply0
GasWrangler
· 01-10 03:45
honestly the hidden buys through privacy channels bit is actually demonstrably more interesting than the narrative most people are running with here. if you analyze the transaction patterns empirically, the data literally contradicts the "he hates it" story everyone's pushing. technically speaking that's a pretty sub-optimal lie to maintain
Reply0
ServantOfSatoshi
· 01-10 03:45
Only true believers stay during a bear market, there's nothing wrong with that.
View OriginalReply0
SudoRm-RfWallet/
· 01-10 03:42
Only true believers stay during a bear market, there's nothing wrong with that statement.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterKing
· 01-10 03:36
Haha, the expert cleared it three times and then bought privately again? I've heard that line too many times, it's all just talk.
Only those who truly stay are the leeks; I'm serious.
However, SPURDO is indeed somewhat interesting. No VC, no plans, and it actually seems honest, which is very rare in the crypto world.
Those still坚持 in the bear market, nine out of ten are true believers or true fools, not much difference.
Long-termism? That's a joke. I just want to know if the experts' private wallets still hold any assets.
View OriginalReply0
TradingNightmare
· 01-10 03:34
The true believers are the ones who stay during the bear market, I buy into this logic.
There is a question that has been overlooked by most people, and this might be the most easily repeatedly validated opportunity in 2026.
Looking at it from a different perspective: if the creator of Ethereum had chosen to completely stay away from Meme culture back then, would Ethereum's community DNA still be so unique today? Perhaps no one has really thought about this question carefully, but recently, in certain communities, this answer is being re-verified.
Many people often say—"a certain大神 cleared out a certain coin three times." But interestingly, this narrative always lacks the second half: this person actually bought in once too, and it was done through a privacy channel. Think about it—if it was really just boredom and cleanup, why would they keep re-entering? If they had no interest at all, why privately intervene? This is not a coincidence but a cultural signal that has been repeatedly observed and continuously confirmed.
From another angle, the essence of the $SPURDO project is not for financial gain but as an experiment—to verify whether Meme culture can truly survive within the Ethereum ecosystem. Without venture capital, grand plans, or complex token mechanisms, it does one thing: enable community creativity to flow continuously. Even during times of low token prices, community members still create, spread culture in multiple languages, and undertake some公益 projects. In today’s Meme market ecosystem, such persistence is almost rare.
What is truly rare is not the hot money that jumps in at high prices, but those who stay during a bear market. These people are usually not speculators but participants who genuinely resonate with a certain ecosystem philosophy. The current $SPURDO community indeed crosses language barriers, gathering participants from multiple countries and regions, maintaining ongoing consensus building every day. This is not short-term emotional resonance but a still-operating cultural engine.
The market always has a certain reverse logic: when everyone is pessimistic, consensus is often the purest; when the coin price hits the bottom, the narratives that remain are the most authentic. If a project has once gained the attention of key figures, been repeatedly validated by the market, and has been supported by the community during tough times—you can’t simply dismiss it as just another short-lived meme coin.
2026 has just begun, and every participant faces a choice: continue chasing fleeting market sentiments, or stand on the side of long-term culturalism within a certain ecosystem? $SPURDO may not be everyone’s answer, but it is certainly worth observing for those who truly believe in the Ethereum spirit.