All those involved in on-chain financial services know this pitfall: if a transaction can be reorged and rolled back, the problem becomes serious. It's not just about arriving a few minutes later; it's that the entire clearing, margin, and risk control thresholds can be compromised. You might think your transaction has been completed and funds have been redeemed, but the next confirmation round could change the result, causing discrepancies in accounts and making it impossible for the risk department to issue consistent statements to users.

From this perspective, the focus of new-generation public chains like Dusk is different. They care less about simply increasing TPS and more about "finality"—whether confirmation times can become more predictable and whether the ultimate state is harder to overturn. For high-reliability compliant assets, institutional funds, and any business involving reconciliation and auditing, this is the critical threshold.

So if you're considering participating in related ecosystems, don't just focus on "how fast"—be sure to ask: how is the finality logic of this chain designed? How long does it take from block production to final confirmation? How are abnormal situations handled? These details determine whether the chain can support real financial applications.