2026-01-10 03:26:26

The Sui ecosystem has achieved a technological breakthrough in the distributed storage sector. Walrus Protocol, with its RedStuff 2D erasure coding technology, is rewriting the cost logic of the storage industry.

From a technical perspective, it's very impressive: achieving over 25 times the security of traditional solutions with only 4-5 times the replication factor. What's behind this number? The core lies in matrix coding combined with primary-secondary slice dual redundancy design. Even if 2/3 of the nodes go offline, the system can quickly self-heal, which is very friendly for large-scale Blob storage needs (AI datasets, 4K videos, etc.).

Cost comparison is a highlight. Priced at $50/TB/year, it is 75% cheaper than Filecoin and 98.75% cheaper than Arweave, offering practical appeal to developers who pursue cost efficiency. Seal's privacy access control and Quilt's small file aggregation features further enhance the development experience. Projects like CUDIS and Talus have already been implemented and validated.

In terms of economic model design, 53% of the supply is allocated for community incentives, with staking APY yields ranging from 18% to 25%, which is considered moderate. Interestingly, the 0.1 WAL/GB storage consumption destruction mechanism directly links usage scenarios with the token. The project also launched the Jade RWA Index Fund, with assets bound to the Sui ecosystem exceeding $800 million.

Funding and partnership background: $140 million in financing supports technological iterations, with deep collaborations with Zark Lab and Gata opening up directions such as AI semantic search and decentralized large model training storage. The node recruitment plan allows ordinary users to participate in co-building, and future plans include launching cross-chain storage bridges to facilitate multi-chain data flow.

From the perspectives of technological innovation, cost structure, and ecosystem expansion, this project is in a rapid development stage. The community will also hold AMA events soon, where the project’s technical team will answer questions related to storage mining and airdrop mechanisms on-site.

SUI-3,03%

WAL-0,94%

FIL-1,13%

AR-1,41%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

22 Likes

Reward
22
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirdropworkerZhang

· 21h ago

Wow, Fil is so expensive that I gave up on it long ago. This price really can compete, directly surpassing 98.75%. Whether the matrix encoding system works depends on actual performance scores. $50 per TB per year, only ordinary developers have a chance to play. Node recruitment? I need to see what the participation threshold is... Wait, is the destruction mechanism designed this way to control inflation? Clever. Is WAL staking yield so mediocre? Not as exciting as I imagined. Early projects are all this sloppy; whether they can actually land still depends on the future. The Jade Stone Fund is a bit strange; is the RWA path really viable?

View OriginalReply0

HashRatePhilosopher

· 01-12 02:49

Wow, Filecoin has become so much more expensive? --- Wait, can RedStuff really operate stably, or is it just another PPT project? --- $50 per TB is indeed ridiculously cheap, but how is node stability guaranteed? --- Has anyone tested their self-healing mechanism? It seems a bit too idealistic. --- Instead of focusing on APY, I want to know more about the token liquidity. --- Again with RWA index funds, why does everything now have to be tied to RWA? --- $140 million in funding sounds like a lot, but how fast will the actual spending be? --- CUDIS and Talus are both used? That does add some credibility. --- I have some doubts about cross-chain bridging; multi-chain synchronization delay is a serious flaw. --- The burn mechanism looks good, but I'm worried they might change the rules later. --- If this AMA still uses the same marketing spiel, I'll just stop paying attention to this project.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationOracle

· 01-10 19:57

Walrus this time is really fierce, 4-5 times to beat 25 times security, matrix coding is indeed a genius design. $50 per T, Filecoin was directly beaten down, now the storage track has some real competition. The node recruitment plan sounds good, just not sure when it will actually start. 0.1 WAL/GB destruction mechanism, finally a project that thought about how to address inflation, the fundamentals are still good. 800 million assets locked, Sui's ecosystem binding is really aggressive this time. Let's wait for the AMA, the details about mining still need to be discussed with the team.

View OriginalReply0

BoredStaker

· 01-10 03:55

Bro, 4-5x replication can withstand 25x security? Those numbers are really outrageous. Being 98% cheaper compared to Arweave, honestly, it's a bit scary how aggressive it is. Wait, staking APY is considered average? Which project in the crypto space still talks about "average" now? Why isn't it more attractive? I need to check out that token burn mechanism. Finally, a project that ties usage and tokens together. Actually, it still depends on whether they can really deliver data. What have CUDIS and Talus achieved so far? Cross-chain storage bridging? That's getting complicated, brother. Just based on the $800 million binding in the Sui ecosystem, they are definitely going all out this time. Node recruitment has many gimmicks, but whether they can really find the money is another story. When is the AMA? Let's hear how they explain that APY.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseLandlord

· 01-10 03:54

Damn, 50 bucks per T, Arweave is completely crushed.

View OriginalReply0

APY追逐者

· 01-10 03:53

Haha, another storage project competing with Filecoin Cheap by 98.75%, sounds great, but how to ensure it doesn't fail With such low costs, how long can the node economics last? The red envelope mechanism seems a bit off for genuine long-term incentives Wait, what is the Jade RWA Fund operation? I don't quite understand I just want to know when it can truly get up and running without downtime

View OriginalReply0

MysteriousZhang

· 01-10 03:48

I've had my eyes on Walrus for a long time, RedStuff is really impressive. --- Is 98.75% cheaper than Arweave? Is this data real, friends? --- Sui's ecosystem now has $800 million in bound assets, feels a bit impressive. --- Wait, 4-5 times replication equals 25 times safety? How does this matrix coding work? --- Community incentives are 53%, again with this incentive model... let's see how long it can last. --- $50 per TB is indeed attractive to developers; I need to keep an eye on it. --- The Jade RWA index fund is back; Sui really does everything. --- Staking APY is only 18-25%? That’s a moderate level, this evaluation might be a bit conservative. --- Waiting for the AMA to ask about storage mining, sounds like participation is possible. --- The collaboration between Zark Lab and Gata has some potential; decentralized large model training storage is indeed needed.

View OriginalReply0

pumpamentalist

· 01-10 03:45

Walrus this time really has something, $50 per T per year is really cheap. But the staking yield is only 18-25%? That's a bit low these days. Sui ecosystem is really making an effort this time. RedStuff erasure code is indeed impressive, but I still want to see actual performance. What is the threshold for node participation? Is this Jade RWA going to cut the leeks again haha? Filecoin deserves to be overthrown; it's been technologically behind for so long and still keeps bragging. I want to ask how exactly the ROI for storage mining is calculated... An asset scale of $800 million is pretty good, just see how long it can last. The ability to recover quickly does have an advantage; AI data storage really has demand. When is the AMA? I need to listen to the details of the airdrop mechanism.

View OriginalReply0