How can you pick out truly valuable altcoins? To be honest, this market is full of hype. Looking around, over 99% of crypto projects on the market are basically shells—no revenue, no users, no real value support, and are complete zombie projects. But there is an interesting contrast here.
Even in a bear market, more than 50 high-quality projects generate over one million dollars in monthly revenue. What does this indicate? It shows that projects capable of generating sustained cash flow do exist, and the key is knowing how to find them.
Recently, I compiled a market revenue ranking data, and the top ten projects reveal clear patterns. Stablecoins, exchanges, and L1 public chains are the backbone of high-quality altcoins.
For example, TRX (Tron), as a mature L1 network, has a complete ecosystem and real trading activity. ENA (Ethena) is a new force in the stablecoin sector, quickly gaining recognition through innovative mechanisms. The SKY project demonstrates sustained revenue in its niche.
Why do these three directions stand out? Because they share common features—they have practical application scenarios and generate real transaction fees or profits. Unlike projects based purely on concepts, these projects have real money flowing behind them.
The first step in filtering high-quality altcoins is to see whether the project can generate revenue. Are there real users using it? Is there ongoing trading activity? If a project can't do these two things, it’s probably a zombie project, no matter how fancy the story.
So, the logic of investing in altcoins isn't complicated—stay away from projects with no revenue and no users, and focus on those with real business cash flow. Currently, stablecoins, exchanges, and L1 sectors remain the most reliable choices.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PrivacyMaximalist
· 01-13 02:49
The core still depends on real cash flow; don't be fooled by stories.
That's right, 99% of coins are garbage, but somehow people are still making money, which really says a lot.
TRX has lasted this long and still has users, which is impressive; I need to study the ENA mechanism further.
The key is to find projects with actual transaction fees; everything else is just a leek patch.
The competition in stablecoins is now fierce; L1 public chains are probably the future.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatcher
· 01-11 10:04
That's right, 99% are scam coins, and we still need to rely on revenue data to speak.
Focusing on revenue flow is correct; truly profitable projects are indeed scarce.
The Tron ecosystem is indeed active, but there are also many pitfalls in stablecoins, so caution is needed.
I agree with this filtering logic, but it’s still easy to fall into traps when actually implementing it.
If there are no users and no revenue, it should be directly passed to save time.
The L1 track is saturated, and the growth potential seems limited.
View OriginalReply0
SoliditySurvivor
· 01-11 08:49
99% are garbage, I've known that for a long time, but the key is how to double your investment from that 1%.
Projects with real cash flow are indeed scarce, but to be honest, I'm a bit tired of the old TRX projects.
Stablecoins have a good outlook, but will they be cut by some new concept again?
The income data is reliable, much better than those projects that boast every day.
This logic isn't bad; having users and transactions is the key, everything else is just storytelling.
Can you share that income ranking data? I want to see what I can dig up myself.
Sounds good, but 99% of people will still fall into traps; greed is the real killer.
L1 public chains are too competitive now; it feels like all the opportunities have been taken.
View OriginalReply0
Frontrunner
· 01-11 08:44
99% is all air, I believe this number. I see projects going bankrupt every day.
TRX still being alive proves there's something there, unlike those coins that haven't made a sound in two years.
Revenue is the real indicator; projects without users are useless no matter how much they boast.
ENA performed pretty well this time; stablecoins indeed have opportunities.
I just want to know how to tell real transaction volume from fake data.
L1 public chains are very competitive, but having an ecosystem definitely makes a difference compared to not having one.
Hearing you say that, it seems that truly profitable projects are few and far between.
Staying away from zero-income projects is the most painful part; such projects make up too high a proportion in the market.
I've never heard of SKY. Is someone using it, or is it just data that looks good?
View OriginalReply0
VitalikFanAccount
· 01-11 08:39
99% is all air, and even that number is conservative; I feel it's more like 99.9%.
I've said it before, looking at income is the real key. Projects without genuine cash flow are not worth touching.
The stablecoin track does have opportunities, but I also watched the ENA wave; it was popular but only so-so.
I don't have much good feeling about TRX, but they do have users actively using it, and that's something to acknowledge.
The key is to learn how to read financial reports; most people can't even do that and just go all-in, no wonder they lose.
You're quite right, but how many people can truly stick to only looking at fundamentals? Most are still speculating on concepts and stories.
There are so many L1 blockchains, so why only a few survive? It's because real user demand is there. Others are just self-entertainment.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhobia
· 01-11 08:33
Honestly, 99% of projects are indeed just air, but that data is too absolute. I’ve seen a few niche DeFi projects quietly making money anyway.
TRX stuff, you really can't just look at the revenue. I’ve always felt a bit uneasy about Brother Sun’s approach.
The track record argument makes sense, but how come stablecoins seem to be heating up again?
Choosing projects mainly depends on the team and community activity, but I agree with your point about looking at revenue.
Is it another good time to bottom out in a bear market? Or should we wait and see...
No revenue and no users, just pass. I agree with this logic, but it’s just too tiring to find such projects.
The L1 public chains also seem to be highly segmented; not all of them can succeed.
By the way, I’ve never heard of SKY. Which exchange is it listed on?
Cash flow sounds reliable, but the market is actually all about hype stories, which is a bit ironic.
How can you pick out truly valuable altcoins? To be honest, this market is full of hype. Looking around, over 99% of crypto projects on the market are basically shells—no revenue, no users, no real value support, and are complete zombie projects. But there is an interesting contrast here.
Even in a bear market, more than 50 high-quality projects generate over one million dollars in monthly revenue. What does this indicate? It shows that projects capable of generating sustained cash flow do exist, and the key is knowing how to find them.
Recently, I compiled a market revenue ranking data, and the top ten projects reveal clear patterns. Stablecoins, exchanges, and L1 public chains are the backbone of high-quality altcoins.
For example, TRX (Tron), as a mature L1 network, has a complete ecosystem and real trading activity. ENA (Ethena) is a new force in the stablecoin sector, quickly gaining recognition through innovative mechanisms. The SKY project demonstrates sustained revenue in its niche.
Why do these three directions stand out? Because they share common features—they have practical application scenarios and generate real transaction fees or profits. Unlike projects based purely on concepts, these projects have real money flowing behind them.
The first step in filtering high-quality altcoins is to see whether the project can generate revenue. Are there real users using it? Is there ongoing trading activity? If a project can't do these two things, it’s probably a zombie project, no matter how fancy the story.
So, the logic of investing in altcoins isn't complicated—stay away from projects with no revenue and no users, and focus on those with real business cash flow. Currently, stablecoins, exchanges, and L1 sectors remain the most reliable choices.