Looking at the development of the crypto market over the past few years, you will notice an interesting paradox.



We talk all day about decentralization, DAO governance, and on-chain autonomy. But what do we see when we open our wallets? Almost all activities in DeFi revolve around USDT and USDC. What are these two essentially? They are IOUs of traditional dollars moved onto the chain, with credit still coming from centralized institutions in New York. In other words, it’s like running open-source software with an open-source system—looks cool, but the roots are still controlled by someone.

This raises a deeper question: if our everyday transaction value standards still rely on the old system, then is the entire ideal of Web3 just a house of cards?

**The emergence of crypto-native stablecoins changes the game**

Products like USD1 have taken a different path. Their credit isn’t backed by some regulatory endorsement but by transparent, publicly verifiable, over-collateralized crypto assets on-chain (such as BNB, ETH). From minting to redemption to liquidation, everything is governed by immutable code. No one can arbitrarily freeze it, and no policy can ban it.

What does this mean? It means we now have, for the first time, a native value unit born in the crypto world, backed by crypto assets, and designed specifically for the crypto economy. In traditional financial terms, this is the true "fiat currency" of the future crypto nation.

**Imagine the scenarios**

DAOs pay contributors using this stablecoin. Crypto lending contracts and commercial transactions are all priced in it. Even on-chain taxes and public service fees are benchmarked against it. As a result, the entire crypto economy can truly break free from the "gravitational pull" of traditional finance.

Of course, at this stage, such products are still very young. To become truly mainstream, they need more diverse collateral types and broader ecosystem applications to support their credibility. But this direction alone is already impressive enough.

**From wealth management to voting**

So, holding or providing liquidity to this stablecoin has gone beyond simple wealth management. You are actually voting with your actions—supporting a financial future governed by code and community. Every liquidity contribution you make is helping to build this new structure.

This vision is indeed more exciting than any annualized return figure.
USD10,01%
BNB0,06%
ETH1,03%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SchrodingerGasvip
· 13h ago
Not bad, but for on-chain stablecoins to truly challenge the position of USDT, the liquidity of the collateral must be strong enough. Wait, over-collateralizing BNB and ETH to mint stablecoins? Isn't that just betting that these two coins won't crash in price? It essentially just shifts the risk into a different form. People keep talking about breaking free from gravitational constraints, but isn't the main trading pair in DeFi still USD1 pairing? That's just how it is in reality. The idea is good, but it depends on whether the ecosystem applications can keep up. Otherwise, even the best code is just an economic model on paper. The real issue is liquidity—without enough depth, who will actually use it for daily transactions...
View OriginalReply0
ConsensusDissentervip
· 13h ago
Damn, finally someone said it. Every day they hype decentralization, but in the end, USDT still holds the power. That's right, there's no true independence at all, just a different mask to keep getting exploited. The idea of USD1 is indeed fresh, but can it survive? History has proven what... Honestly, code governance sounds great, but without sufficient liquidity, it's all pointless. Your voting theory is a bit idealistic; most people are in it for the profits. The more collateral you have, the greater the risk—it's a vicious cycle. That said, at least someone is trying to break the status quo, and I acknowledge that.
View OriginalReply0
faded_wojak.ethvip
· 13h ago
Well said, but we're all watching the USDT freezing incident. Agreed, the concept of "fiat currency" on the chain is indeed worth pondering. This ideal sounds great, but is there enough liquidity? It's still too early. The core issue is the creditworthiness of collateral; how long it can support is really hard to say. The voting analogy is interesting... but I still need to see how much I can earn, haha. Reasonable point, but migrating from USDT to USD1 will take some time. Finally, someone hit the nail on the head—it's truly absurd that DeFi is being hijacked by stablecoins. This is the right path for Web3—eliminating the middlemen. Who doesn't care about annualized returns? Don't pretend.
View OriginalReply0
DefiPlaybookvip
· 13h ago
According to data, USDT/USDC accounts for 72% in DeFi, but what does this actually indicate? We claim to be decentralized, yet we are still bound by centralized assets—ironic, isn't it? --- The growth of native stablecoins like USD1 in TVL is indeed worth noting, but the key question is: how to quantify the liquidation risk under an over-collateralization mechanism? I need to look at the code to say more. --- It's a good idea, but at this stage, the ecosystem depth is still insufficient. More application layer support is needed; having only a theoretical framework is not enough. Just a risk warning. --- From three dimensions: liquidity depth, collateral diversity, and ecosystem application coverage. All are indispensable; missing any one of them could lead to failure. --- It sounds good, but I'm more concerned about when this will truly replace the status of USDT. Based on on-chain data, we're still a long way off. --- A beautiful dose of idealistic motivation, but what about practical implementation? Can the details like liquidation mechanisms, price oracles, and liquidity mining incentives withstand the test? --- This logical chain is a bit long; it feels like the middle links are prone to breaking. Native crypto stablecoins ≠ solving financial autonomy—two different things.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)