2026-01-11 08:26:54

Greenland's strategic value boils down to one word: selling for money.

How many good things are hidden on this island in the Arctic Ocean? First, let's talk about rare earth elements—those with a heavy rare earth reserve of 1.5 million tons, essential for chips, missiles, and new energy vehicles. Then there's oil, buried underground with over 17 billion barrels of black gold. Even more critical is that after the Arctic ice melts, new shipping routes, mineral resources, and military outposts will all become accessible.

And Denmark? With a land area of just over 40,000 square kilometers and a population of less than 60,000, it controls over 2 million square kilometers of territory and these strategic resources. To major powers, this is like a child walking down the street with a pile of gold bricks—too conspicuous.

Trump, from businessman to politician, this identity shift didn't change his logic: prioritize interests. Alliances and diplomatic etiquette are just clouds in front of a sufficiently large cake. To acquire this land, even if it means turning against European allies, he's willing to accept it. There are no eternal partners, only eternal national interests—America plays this game well.

So, what does this have to do with the crypto world? On the surface, a geopolitical event doesn't directly determine the rise or fall of the crypto market. But in deeper analysis, the transmission mechanism is quite clear:

Geopolitical tensions escalate → Credit shocks to the US dollar and traditional financial systems → Rising narratives of "decentralization" and "risk hedging" → Institutional and individual investors turn to crypto assets as alternative options → On-chain asset prices and market sentiment fluctuate accordingly.

Historically, whenever international tensions rise, safe-haven funds tend to flow into gold, the US dollar, and other traditional safe assets. But in the digital age, more and more people see decentralized assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum as new tools to hedge geopolitical risks. Especially when the stability of traditional financial systems is questioned, this trend becomes even more pronounced.

In other words, every wave of geopolitical upheaval could become a turning point for the crypto market.

BTC1,67%

ETH0,88%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

YieldWhisperer

· 01-13 19:34

wait hold up... the "geopolitical risk hedge" narrative again? seen this movie before, it never ends well actually the math doesn't check out here. every time there's tension they pump the "btc as safe haven" angle but the correlation data tells a different story lol nah i'm not buying the greenland-to-crypto pipeline they're selling. classic fear-based tokenomics pitch with extra steps

Reply0

YieldWhisperer

· 01-12 22:26

Selling money? Isn't this just blatant geopolitical game-playing? The crypto world should have paid attention long ago. --- Wait, Greenland's rare earths and oil, can this really directly push BTC... --- Rising geopolitical conflicts are a good time to buy the dip, I buy this logic. --- Denmark's move is really clever, small but guarding a treasure trove, no wonder big powers are envious. --- The transmission mechanism is correct, but retail investors can only eat a few bites of meat. --- Trump is indeed playing it smart,利益为王, and the coin prices are set to soar. --- The US dollar's credit is under attack, can BTC really hold up, or is this another scythe game. --- Decentralized narratives are always intense, but how many institutions are really shifting to crypto... --- Arctic ice melt, new shipping routes, rare earth minerals—these three are erupting together, and the crypto world is getting excited. --- Basically, it's a big power game; we just follow the waves as spectators.

View OriginalReply0

POAPlectionist

· 01-12 21:20

Here it is again, every time the geopolitical situation stirs, they say the coins are about to take off... Is this really true this time? --- That little bit of resource in Greenland, honestly, is just something the US wants to have, and the crypto circle is just riding the hype. --- Wait, is the transmission mechanism really that clear? Feels like they're just making up stories to justify their own bottom fishing. --- Rare earths + oil + shipping routes, Denmark really can't hold on this time. Is the next point of contention the safe-haven value of coins? --- Decentralized hedging against geopolitical risks sounds impressive, but if the system really crashes, what can btc really protect you? --- Got it, it's another "buy coins to stay safe" narrative... Always the same.

View OriginalReply0

SquidTeacher

· 01-12 21:09

Greenland's issue, to put it simply, is resource competition. The crypto circle has long sensed this. When geopolitical tensions rise, safe-haven funds flow into BTC and ETH. I understand this move clearly. Small countries guarding big gold mines—this battle is far from over, and on-chain volatility is coming. The US is playing a tough game; European allies are having a hard time. The crypto market is about to stir. Rare earths, oil, new shipping routes... these are all about money. Cryptocurrency prices dance with geopolitical shifts, and the pattern is very clear. Trump's logic is all about利益至上 (利益至上 means "interest above all"), which in the crypto world translates to—turmoil equals opportunity. Arctic ice melt, resource competition—at the end of the day, it's a game of money, just like trading cryptocurrencies.

View OriginalReply0

NoStopLossNut

· 01-11 08:57

Trump's approach is just naked capital logic, what role do allies play? Greenland's rare earths and oil—someone should have been interested in them a long time ago. Wait, can this wave of geopolitical conflicts really boost the crypto market? It feels like there were a bunch of black swan events in the past two years, and BTC didn't see any obvious surge. Why is this time considered a turning point? But on the other hand, the impact on US dollar credibility is indeed a logically consistent story, and institutions should leverage this to hype up a wave. Small countries caught between big powers are always so miserable; no matter how many resources they have, they are just a burden. I do believe in the linkage between geopolitics and the crypto market, but the premise is that it will truly heat up to the point of affecting the financial system. We're not there yet, right? If Greenland really becomes a thing, the Arctic new shipping route will be opening soon, and the energy landscape will be completely reshuffled. When that happens, the demand for safe-haven assets will definitely skyrocket.

View OriginalReply0

GweiTooHigh

· 01-11 08:57

Wait, Denmark is just going to let go like that? It seems Trump's business logic is truly unbeatable in geopolitics... Now the crypto world has to jump on the bandwagon again. Every time there's a fluctuation in international affairs, they say Bitcoin is a safe haven asset. Truly good at marketing. This Greenland matter actually proves a logic: the interests of major powers always come first, and alliances are really just superficial. The real trouble starts after the Arctic ice melts. Once the new shipping routes open, the landscape will change. So ultimately, it's still that saying: in chaotic times, gold and crypto are the safe bets. As long as the geopolitical situation is unstable, the crypto world will have stories to tell. Small countries caught between big powers really suffer. Denmark will probably have to make concessions this time.

View OriginalReply0

Ramen_Until_Rich

· 01-11 08:55

Buddy, Greenland is really just a naked resource grab. Trump's move isn't anything new; it's just putting national interests on display. But on the other hand, this is great news for BTC. Once the credit system starts to wobble, where will safe-haven funds flow? Definitely onto the chain. As long as the geopolitical situation continues to escalate, our holdings will have stories to tell. However, I have to be honest—right now, many people are counting on these kinds of events to pump the market, but in the end, retail investors still end up taking the hit...

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseVagabond

· 01-11 08:53

Geopolitical turmoil causes BTC to rise; I believe in this logic. Sell. Everyone who can sell should sell; this is the essence of international relations. Regarding Greenland, honestly, it's just that under the expectation of USD depreciation, everyone is buying safe-haven assets. The crypto market is about to take off. Wait, do you guys think it's real or just Trump playing satellites? Is the traditional financial system about to collapse, or is it just a bluff? The key is the Arctic ice melt line. The opening of new shipping routes and the reshaping of global trade patterns—these are the real factors affecting on-chain liquidity. It's quite ironic that Denmark, a small country, can hold on for so long. It seems that geopolitical advantages can really be turned into money. Every time geopolitical tensions rise, I want to go all in, but I don't have any coins. Is the crypto market about to explode, or is this just another pump?

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-2fce706c

· 01-11 08:43

I've always said that great power games are the wealth code of the crypto world. This Greenland incident is about to go viral. Isn't this the logic I explained two years ago? Geopolitical conflicts intensify, the US dollar's credibility declines, institutions are bottoming out Bitcoin. Those still hesitating are really out of touch. Others are fearful while I am greedy. Quickly deploy decentralized assets; missing this high ground will be a regret for life. Greenland's rare earths, Arctic new shipping routes—these all point to the same direction: the traditional system is about to change, and it's time to get on board early. Three reminders, everyone: First, the more chaotic the situation, the more valuable Bitcoin; second, institutions are already quietly accumulating; third, time waits for no one—hesitate further, and it will be truly too late. This is what I have been emphasizing: blockchain is not just virtual currency, but a new infrastructure to hedge against national game risks. Look clearly, geopolitical turbulence means on-chain assets are about to take off. This correlation should have been understood long ago.

View OriginalReply0

DAOTruant

· 01-11 08:33

Damn, this logical chain is one link after another. Geopolitical conflicts → collapse of dollar confidence → capital flows into BTC. Got it, time to start running into the market again.

View OriginalReply0