2026-01-11 10:29:01

Many influencers won't support projects valued above $200K because they're aware there's limited momentum and risk exposure. The calculus is different for others in the space—some are willing to back projects at $250M valuations if the fundamentals align. It's not just about the numbers; it's about conviction and risk tolerance. Different players operate on different frameworks.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BlockchainArchaeologist

· 8h ago

Basically, it's a confidence game; different people have different betting methods.

View OriginalReply0

MemeKingNFT

· 8h ago

200K dare not touch, turn around and smash 250M. I've seen this double standard logic many times in 2021... In the end, it's all just a pretense of a leek mentality. What is the true bottom consensus? No one knows, everyone is gambling.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerAirdrop

· 8h ago

Honestly, I'm a bit tired of this line of argument. Isn't it essentially a risk pricing issue?

View OriginalReply0

LiquiditySurfer

· 8h ago

Risk appetite is really like choosing a surfing spot—some only dare to ride 2-meter waves, while others go straight for the big wave. The difference between $200K and $250M actually reflects a difference in conviction, not a math problem. The most concerning are those who follow the crowd and endorse without even doing due diligence themselves.

View OriginalReply0

FarmHopper