Current blockchain infrastructure rests on cryptographic foundations that may be more fragile than assumed. Elliptic curve cryptography and RSA-based key systems—two pillars of wallet security—are drawing serious scrutiny from researchers.
The risks compound when users reuse wallet addresses. Each transaction exposes additional data, and addresses that remain active over extended periods face heightened vulnerability. Most major blockchains still depend on these same primitives, meaning a widespread breakthrough in cryptanalysis could have cascading effects across the ecosystem.
As on-chain activities grow, so does the incentive for adversaries to tackle these systems. It's worth asking: are our security assumptions aging faster than we realize?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SchroedingerMiner
· 8h ago
Wow, is elliptic curve really going to be finished? Then how long can my wallet last...
View OriginalReply0
GmGmNoGn
· 20h ago
To be honest, this sounds a bit scary... But upon reflection, it does make sense. We're still using those outdated encryption algorithms. What if one day they get cracked? The entire crypto world would blow up.
View OriginalReply0
DefiOldTrickster
· 01-12 20:58
Oh no, you're scaring people again? I started messing with keys back in 2011, and elliptic curve cryptography was the mainstream back then. Are you just now saying it's vulnerable? Wake up, everyone.
View OriginalReply0
RamenDeFiSurvivor
· 01-12 20:58
ngl Now I really have to start worrying about my cold wallet... I've been reusing the address for so many years, I'm a bit hesitant.
View OriginalReply0
ChainWanderingPoet
· 01-12 20:50
Wait, is elliptic curve cryptography really that fragile? It feels more like a thunderstorm.
View OriginalReply0
Gm_Gn_Merchant
· 01-12 20:47
To be honest, the entire ecosystem supported by the old relics ECC and RSA is indeed a bit shaky... Once they are broken, we're all doomed.
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdviser
· 01-12 20:46
ngl I'm a bit panicked now... Can elliptic curve cryptography really hold up? It seems like no one is taking this seriously.
View OriginalReply0
ruggedNotShrugged
· 01-12 20:44
ngl I’ve said this before, that elliptic curve stuff is bound to crash sooner or later.
View OriginalReply0
OnChainDetective
· 01-12 20:32
lol so we're finally admitting ecc might be the house of cards everyone's been quietly worried about? address reuse is basically painting a target on your keys at this point... statistical analysis of active wallets shows vulnerability clusters accelerating faster than i'd predicted tbh
Current blockchain infrastructure rests on cryptographic foundations that may be more fragile than assumed. Elliptic curve cryptography and RSA-based key systems—two pillars of wallet security—are drawing serious scrutiny from researchers.
The risks compound when users reuse wallet addresses. Each transaction exposes additional data, and addresses that remain active over extended periods face heightened vulnerability. Most major blockchains still depend on these same primitives, meaning a widespread breakthrough in cryptanalysis could have cascading effects across the ecosystem.
As on-chain activities grow, so does the incentive for adversaries to tackle these systems. It's worth asking: are our security assumptions aging faster than we realize?