The story of the tortoise and the hare is, when viewed through the crypto lens, the most realistic investment script.
In this circle, there are especially many rabbit projects—rushing after whatever is hot, gaining fame on launch day, then quickly lying flat. These projects share a common flaw: they only think about quick profits, refusing to put effort into refining technology and ecosystem development, resulting in a flash-in-the-pan outcome.
In contrast, the projects that have survived until now and are still regarded positively follow a similar logic—they persist in doing one thing well. Take a certain leading stablecoin settlement layer as an example: from testnet to mainnet stable operation, progressing step by step, without hype or chasing hot trends. Instead, they focus on core payment technology, tackling throughput and latency one by one. Their wallets have real products, and the DeFi ecosystem is gradually improving. Although it may seem unremarkable, this steady and solid approach is truly the way to survive a bear market.
Honestly, what the crypto market currently lacks most is this kind of perseverance—setting a clear direction and pushing forward with full force, unaffected by the noise along the way. Such projects have tangible ecosystem data: on-chain TVL is steadily increasing, user base continues to grow, developers are gradually gathering, moving from payment corridors to application development, step by step.
That’s why some tokens’ value never relies on short-term hype—because the underlying ecosystem is genuinely growing, and every data point is a solid accumulation. This logic stands the test of bull and bear cycles best.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
token_therapist
· 14h ago
To be honest, this set of theories sounds comfortable, but I've seen too many projects claiming to be "rooted in technology" end up cutting corners. The key is how to distinguish them—who can guarantee that those data are not inflated?
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainFoodie
· 14h ago
ngl this hits different when you think about it like... farm-to-fork supply chains, right? like those projects that actually build infrastructure vs the ones just farming hype for a quick harvest 💭 the ones with real staying power? they're like slow-fermented sourdough, not instant ramen. been watching this play out forever and it's literally proof-of-work meets proof-of-freshness, you know?
Reply0
CryptoMotivator
· 15h ago
Really, those still chasing hot topics now all have the mentality of leek farmers
Speaking of which, sticking to doing one thing sounds easy, but how many have made it this far
I really dislike projects that boast right after launch and have nothing to show a month later
Ecosystem data can't be fooled; if TVL is increasing, it means people are indeed using it
Still, you should look for those who quietly do big things, don't be blinded by temporary surges
I believe that willpower can't be judged in a year or two, but in five years you'll see the true results
That's right, projects that can't survive a bear market are pointless even if they surge in a bull market
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityNinja
· 15h ago
There's nothing wrong with that, but most people can't do it. They keep their eyes on the gains, and who has the patience to stay with the project team through the tough times.
The ones who truly survive are mostly those who are considered too slow.
Waiting for another wave of FOMO to harvest the retail investors.
Damn, this is the project logic I want, but unfortunately, there are too few.
Rooted in doing things is indeed rare, but traffic and popularity always attract retail investors more. There's nothing we can do.
The story of the tortoise and the hare is, when viewed through the crypto lens, the most realistic investment script.
In this circle, there are especially many rabbit projects—rushing after whatever is hot, gaining fame on launch day, then quickly lying flat. These projects share a common flaw: they only think about quick profits, refusing to put effort into refining technology and ecosystem development, resulting in a flash-in-the-pan outcome.
In contrast, the projects that have survived until now and are still regarded positively follow a similar logic—they persist in doing one thing well. Take a certain leading stablecoin settlement layer as an example: from testnet to mainnet stable operation, progressing step by step, without hype or chasing hot trends. Instead, they focus on core payment technology, tackling throughput and latency one by one. Their wallets have real products, and the DeFi ecosystem is gradually improving. Although it may seem unremarkable, this steady and solid approach is truly the way to survive a bear market.
Honestly, what the crypto market currently lacks most is this kind of perseverance—setting a clear direction and pushing forward with full force, unaffected by the noise along the way. Such projects have tangible ecosystem data: on-chain TVL is steadily increasing, user base continues to grow, developers are gradually gathering, moving from payment corridors to application development, step by step.
That’s why some tokens’ value never relies on short-term hype—because the underlying ecosystem is genuinely growing, and every data point is a solid accumulation. This logic stands the test of bull and bear cycles best.