#交易平台业务 Korea's recent wave of overseas expansion is quite interesting. Moving 160 trillion KRW abroad seems to be caused by regulatory gaps, but from a copy-trading perspective, this reflects the fundamental pursuit of profit by traders and capital—wherever there is leverage, derivatives, or complex products, money flows there.

Although Upbit and Bithumb have substantial revenue scales, the signal of stagnation is very telling. Domestic platforms being suppressed by players like Binance and Bybit indicates that major players have already voted with their feet. When I follow traders, I prioritize the platform ecosystem they choose—if a platform has limited trading products or liquidity dries up, even the most skilled traders can't fully unleash their potential.

The number of investors has grown to 10 million, but domestic platforms are stagnating, which is a concerning disconnect. When selecting traders to copy, I am more cautious about those mainly active on heavily regulated platforms—not because they are incapable, but because the toolchain limits their profit ceiling. Conversely, experts who switched to overseas platforms early and have experience with complex derivatives often have clearer risk exposure and are more worth observing.

When rules change, understanding who is proactively adapting and who is passively enduring determines who you can follow and how to do so.