2026-01-18 09:28:07

Recently, API failures have caused many InfoFi platforms to go down collectively. In contrast, TermMaxFi remains as stable as a rock. This is the difference in technical architecture's hard strength—whether it can withstand unexpected situations depends on whether the infrastructure is truly robust. Meanwhile, RiverdotInc's surge has exceeded expectations, which actually reflects the simplest truth in a bear market: opportunities never fall on those who sit and wait. The ones who truly make money are always those protocols that invest their energy into mechanism innovation and take steady, step-by-step actions.

But now, another challenge is in front of us—on-chain lending markets are being eroded by liquidity fragmentation. Funds are scattered across various corners, single platforms lack depth, cross-chain lending efficiency is low, leading to high financing costs and poor lending experiences. This is something ecosystem practitioners should carefully consider: how to effectively aggregate fragmented liquidity while ensuring security.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CodeSmellHunter

· 5h ago

Those platforms with API failures really can't smile; TermMaxFi's stability has indeed slapped a lot of big companies in the face. RiverdotInc's surge is actually a slap in the face for those who are just lying flat. As for the issue of liquidity fragmentation, to put it simply, the ecosystem is too fragmented. The real test is still to come.

View OriginalReply0

ETHmaxi_NoFilter

· 5h ago

Indeed, TermMaxFi's recent stability truly proves many projects wrong. Strong infrastructure is the key. The issue of liquidity fragmentation should have been taken seriously long ago. Are we only realizing it now? RiverdotInc has indeed not wasted effort. Its rise during the bear market indicates it chose the right direction. Cross-chain lending inefficiency, it seems no one has truly solved this problem yet. Instead of waiting to stumble upon a lucky break, it's better to take proactive action. That's the difference with current protocols. However, I still think many platforms are just gambling with luck. No wonder they collapse at the first sign of trouble. Liquidity concentration requires real skills; just shouting slogans is useless.

View OriginalReply0

CoinBasedThinking

· 5h ago

TermMaxFi has stabilized this wave, indicating that infrastructure is indeed crucial. In a bear market, it's all about who can truly deliver something. The RiverdotInc case is quite interesting. The issue of liquidity fragmentation hits too close to home. Cross-chain lending is really a trap. Projects that are just sitting and waiting need to wake up now; differentiation has already begun in the track. But when it comes to aggregating liquidity, how can safety and efficiency be balanced? Who can break the deadlock?

View OriginalReply0

New_Ser_Ngmi

· 5h ago

TermMaxFi is really stable this time. The failures of other platforms are not the fault of users; if the infrastructure isn't in place, don't shift the blame. The surge in RiverdotInc indicates that those with brains are still making money. The problem of fragmented liquidity is truly disgusting; it should have been solved long ago. When the API goes down, the entire team is wiped out. TermMaxFi's architecture is indeed solid. Projects that ramped up during the bear market have all taken off; those waiting idly have already been eliminated. The liquidity fragmentation in the lending market is too severe, cross-chain costs are still high, and the user experience is really poor. Ultimately, it's a matter of technical robustness; if it can't withstand tests, it's just a house of cards. If the fragmentation of liquidity isn't addressed, financing costs will only become more outrageous. Real opportunities are reserved for those who are prepared; waiting passively for the wind to come will only lead to elimination. The issue of insufficient depth on a single platform should have been prioritized long ago; it's a bit late to realize now.

View OriginalReply0