Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
Recently, a question has sparked discussion in the community: should data storage be built on centralized infrastructure or should we jump on the decentralized train early?
This is truly a dilemma. On one hand, centralized solutions like AWS are incredibly stable, offering fast performance and low costs, and they even compensate for outages. On the other hand, decentralized storage sounds ideal, but it always makes people nervous—after all, there aren't many mature cases yet.
However, a recent project has some interesting technical details. It uses RedStuff erasure coding combined with on-chain proof mechanisms, which theoretically can guarantee data integrity even if 66% of nodes go offline. Plus, it employs encryption schemes like Seal to prevent privacy leaks. From a technical perspective, this addresses many pain points. Compared to centralized solutions, which are fast but always carry risks of data deletion or theft.
Currently, everyone is discussing how AI data will explode by 2026, which means storage demands will skyrocket. Those who are already deploying decentralized storage now, how competitive will they be then? It's really hard to say.
Many people are still on the surface waiting and observing, but secretly they are already testing the waters. Are you going to continue betting on the "security" of centralized solutions, or do you want to see how far these new schemes can go?