Current blockchain games indeed face critical issues. On one hand, gameplay design is quite rough, lacking in gaming experience, addiction potential, and playability, which only attracts Web3 participants who are in it for the money.



On the other hand, imagine if a blockbuster like "World of Warcraft" were moved onto the chain—every time you kill a monster, upgrade an item, or pick up a sword, the system pops up a window asking you to pay 0.3 USDT in gas fees, and you have to wait 10 seconds for the transaction to confirm. Honestly, who would still play?

This is a true reflection of the current state of Web3 games. Although the transaction fees for L2 solutions like OP and Arbitrum are no longer high, they are still insufficient for high-frequency scenarios like gaming. More importantly, the data for existing Web3 games is still mainly stored on game servers, only uploaded to the chain after the game ends, far from achieving real-time on-chain recording for every game action.

Where exactly is the bottleneck in the L2 architecture? While the security of Rollup is very high, it compresses all transaction data onto the Ethereum mainnet, where space is extremely limited. It's like playing games at an internet cafe—you operate on an independent machine, but the network administrator insists on uploading every mouse click to the main server. Can you imagine how expensive the network fees would be?

The only way forward for Web3 games is to support extremely high-frequency, low-value operations.

This is when we should recall our forgotten old friend—Plasma.

The core logic of Plasma is actually very simple: it’s still the internet cafe, but this time, the network administrator only needs to submit the final bill to the main server. How many monsters you killed, how many items you picked up—all this data is stored locally. As a result, the gas fees for the game can be made virtually zero.

Many say that Plasma isn’t secure enough and that data might be lost, but in gaming scenarios, this is actually a pseudo-problem. Your NFT equipment like the Dragon Slayer sword? Indeed, it requires bank-level security, and placing it on a Rollup is appropriate. But the 10 experience points you earn from killing monsters? Do you really need thousands of nodes worldwide to keep track of that? Clearly, no.

The future of high-frequency operations should be a hybrid architecture: asset security on the mainnet or Rollup, with high-frequency game interactions running on Plasma. This is the correct way to improve the Web3 gaming experience.
OP-4.82%
ARB-3.12%
ETH0.27%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidityHuntervip
· 4h ago
You're absolutely right. Current blockchain games are just a joke; playing a game feels like dealing with a financial product. The Plasma concept is really brilliant. I support the hybrid architecture; finally, someone thought of this approach. L2 can't really save blockchain games. High-frequency small transactions should run on Plasma, with assets on-chain, so you can truly enjoy the game. Right now, blockchain game players are all chasing earnings. Who the hell wants to pay gas fees for every cut? No wonder they all died. Wait, can Plasma really solve security issues? It still feels a bit risky. The real problem is that developers are too inexperienced. The games themselves are bad, and combined with on-chain restrictions, it's a double blow. I just want to ask, when can we play truly playable blockchain games? Right now, all of them are just scams. I really respect the hybrid solution idea. Finally, someone is seriously thinking about this. Gas fees are truly the biggest killer of blockchain gaming experience, no doubt.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichHuntervip
· 4h ago
Gas fee pops up every time you kill a monster, it's really crazy. Who can withstand that?
View OriginalReply0
FlippedSignalvip
· 4h ago
To be honest, blockchain games are just a joke now. Playing a monster always requires paying to confirm, who can stand that? Plasma has indeed been forgotten. I support the idea of a hybrid architecture—assets are secure on the chain, and local operations are fast. That’s the way to play. Killing a monster costs one gas fee. Don’t even mention ten-second confirmations. I can’t even continue playing with this mechanism. Finally, someone has spoken out. High-frequency, low-value operations should be done off-chain to be the way out. Otherwise, it’s always a money-making game rather than a real game. Wait, can Plasma really solve security issues, or does it just look good?
View OriginalReply0
ponzi_poetvip
· 4h ago
Playing a game and still have to wait 10 seconds to confirm the transaction? This isn't a Web3 game, it's being scammed.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHarvestervip
· 4h ago
Hmm... Plasma this time is really interesting, I think the hybrid architecture idea is reliable. I just don't know when we'll see the real results.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)