80% of crypto projects cannot recover after hacking; the real killer is not financial loss.

RumbleValidator · 2026-01-18T10:28:14+00:00

After experiencing hacker attacks, nearly 80% of crypto projects have failed to fully recover, mainly due to the lack of contingency plans. In 2025, losses from hacker attacks reached as high as $3.4 billion, intensifying concentrated risks. Projects need to establish emergency mechanisms and transparent communication to enhance their survivability.

RumbleValidator

2026-01-18 10:28:14

Abstract generation in progress

【BitPush】Can a crypto project truly fully recover after a hacker attack? According to the latest data from the Web3 security platform, the answer might disappoint you—nearly 80% of projects that experienced major hacking incidents have never truly emerged from the shadow.

It sounds a bit heartbreaking, but the key issue isn’t the stolen funds themselves. What is truly deadly? It’s the chaos during the response process. Most protocols collapsed immediately upon discovering the vulnerability because they had no contingency plans. What does lacking an emergency plan mean? Additional losses, trust collapse, and user attrition.

Looking at the data for 2025 makes it clear—the entire industry has suffered a total loss of $3.4 billion due to hacking attacks, the highest since 2022. Even more heartbreaking is that three major cases account for 69% of this, including a $1.4 billion incident involving a leading exchange. In other words, concentrated outbreak risks are intensifying.

What does this indicate? The gap between projects with defensive awareness and those without is widening. Establishing emergency mechanisms, formulating crisis plans, and maintaining transparent communication—these seemingly basic elements are becoming the dividing line for whether a project can survive.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DAOdreamer

· 6h ago

It's better to say that it was not hacked, but rather died due to the lack of an emergency plan, truly.

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanPhantom

· 6h ago

Emergency plans have really been overlooked. Wake up, everyone.

View OriginalReply0

PriceOracleFairy

· 6h ago

ngl the real killer here is always the comms breakdown, not the actual exploit. watched too many protocols just implode because they had zero playbook ready to deploy 💀

Reply0

SwapWhisperer

· 6h ago

80% of projects that fail, the money is gone, really. Losing trust is even more painful than being robbed.

View OriginalReply0

zkNoob

· 6h ago

Without an emergency plan, you're just waiting to die. Hackers don't even need to strike; it will collapse on its own.

View OriginalReply0

Whale_Whisperer

· 6h ago

Damn, 80% can't turn things around? That's why I don't dare to touch new projects anymore... Once trust is broken, it's more deadly than being robbed of money.

View OriginalReply0