Traditional cloud service storage costs have always been a heavy burden for large enterprises, especially in the field of massive data storage where cloud providers tend to charge exorbitantly. Recently, I came across an interesting comparison case: the cost difference for storing 100TB of production data for a manufacturing company is shockingly large.



Using Alibaba Cloud's enterprise storage solution, 100TB of data costs about $200,000 per year, not including hidden costs like data migration and management maintenance. In contrast, with Walrus's enterprise solution, it only costs $40,000—an 80% reduction in price. Even more impressive, Walrus offers a one-click data migration tool, eliminating the need for enterprises to invest technical manpower to handle the process.

From performance metrics, the actual data after migration also speaks volumes—data read latency dropped from 120ms to 80ms, an improvement of nearly 30%. Thanks to its decentralized architecture, the system avoids single points of failure, maintaining data availability at 99.99%, which is more reliable than the traditional solution's 99.9%.

One last point worth mentioning is that Walrus provides dedicated account managers and technical support teams for enterprise users, which can significantly ease many concerns about going on-chain. Overall, this approach is indeed a good idea for large enterprises looking to reduce storage costs while ensuring stability.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
APY_Chaservip
· 4h ago
Wait, an 80% price difference? That number sounds a bit suspicious. I need to see real cases with my own eyes to believe it.
View OriginalReply0
PhantomMinervip
· 4h ago
No, wait... Alibaba Cloud 200,000 a year? Walrus only 40,000? Are these numbers real? --- Decentralized storage is really taking off, traditional big companies should be panicking now --- An 80% cost difference... honestly, that's a bit exaggerated, but if performance also improves then it's definitely a win --- 99.99% availability sounds good, just not sure how long Walrus can run stably --- I believe in one-click migration, but are enterprise users really willing to switch everything over? --- It feels like Walrus's publicity is a bit overhyped, but on the other hand, cloud service providers definitely need to be shaken up --- Data read speed increased by 30%, this is a real noticeable difference --- Decentralized architecture has no single point of failure... I've heard this logic too many times, actual stability still depends on operations and maintenance --- Providing dedicated account managers really hits the pain point, big companies are all in for this --- 200,000 vs 40,000, even if Walrus is a bit more expensive, it shouldn't be this bad, traditional cloud services are indeed cutting the leeks
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractPhobiavip
· 4h ago
Wait, $200,000 a year? That's basically money grabbing, cloud service providers are really outrageous. I need to take another look at the Walrus figure; an 80% price difference is so exaggerated, is it real? Performance can still be improved by 30%? Is decentralized storage already so competitive? I used to think it was just a concept.
View OriginalReply0
ForkThisDAOvip
· 4h ago
Alibaba Cloud's pricing is truly outrageous, an 80% difference? This isn't competition, it's crushing. Decentralized storage is impressive; finally seeing cloud service providers being revolutionized. This case is pretty impressive, but I need to test it myself to be sure. Saving $800,000 annually on 100TB, anyone would have to consider it. Read latency is directly cut by 30%, and data is more stable, which is critical for manufacturing. Wait, how difficult must it be for those companies forced to use Alibaba Cloud now? Walrus one-click migration is really thoughtful, saving the technical team from hassle. It sounds risk-free, but I still want to see actual user feedback. 99.99% availability is quite solid, it's at a financial-grade level. Web3 storage is really starting to stand up; this time, it feels a bit different.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainDetectiveBingvip
· 4h ago
Wow, 200,000 yuan a year on Alibaba Cloud? An 80% price difference, you're not joking, right? That number is way too outrageous. Is this Walrus really reliable? I've seen quite a few decentralized storage projects fail. Such a huge cost difference, how are traditional cloud service providers still doing well? Cheap is cheap, but I'm just worried about issues when migrating data. 99.99% availability sounds good, but can it really be stable in practice?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)