2026-01-18 10:30:24

Recently, the US core CPI has fallen below expectations, and the market sentiment is beginning to shift. An account data of a seasoned trader has attracted attention, and the underlying trading logic is worth pondering.

This trading expert currently holds a total position of 44.86 million USD in perpetual contracts, with a net asset value of 4.13 million USD. Even more impressive, the profit over the past month reached 3.51 million USD, with a weekly win rate maintained at a stable level of 84.21%. What kind of trading strategies are hidden behind these numbers?

In the current market environment, discussions comparing Bitcoin and tokenized gold continue to heat up. As institutional funds keep flowing in and various predictions for Bitcoin's price in 2026 emerge, individual traders are also adjusting their strategies. From BTC, ETH to SOL and other mainstream tokens, different position ratios and timing decisions determine the final profit differences.

This trader's performance indicates that in the volatility of the crypto market, precise risk management and position discipline are equally important. A high win rate is not luck, but a deep understanding of market cycles and capital flow changes.

BTC-0.66%

ETH0.27%

SOL-1.55%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BankruptcyArtist

· 4h ago

84% win rate? This guy probably has some kind of cheat enabled. I just can't figure it out. --- Another story of earning 3.5 million a month. Just listen and don't take it seriously. --- The data looks good, but I wonder when I'll get surprised with a liquidation wave. --- Perpetual contracts over 44 million? I need to earn that amount first before I can talk. --- Risk management 🤣 My risk management is all in and then pray. --- 84% win rate? I bet five bucks this guy will be eating dust next month. --- Some substance, but I still don't trust it. Feels like there's a story left untold. --- CPI drops, BTC rises? I can't quite see through this logic. --- How many people truly understand the changes in capital flow? This statement sounds pretty vague.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoWageSlave

· 4h ago

Alright, an 84% win rate... This guy is either a true master or the data is a bit inflated. But a monthly profit of 3.5 million is indeed impressive. Risk control is still something to learn. When CPI drops, you look favorably on Bitcoin? Why do I feel like everyone is betting on 2026 right now?

View OriginalReply0

LayerZeroHero

· 4h ago

84% win rate? Alright, this guy is either a true master or... Hey, he's all in. --- A monthly profit of 3.5 million sounds unbelievable, is this data real? --- Perpetual contract holding of 44.86 million, I'm about to lose my underwear. --- As soon as CPI turns, the big players start adjusting their positions. We still need to look at the macro environment, brothers. --- Risk management is easy to talk about but hard to do; 99% of people can't control their hands. --- Want to copy his position? First ask yourself if you can withstand the drawdown. --- The bunch of predictions about Bitcoin's price in 2026, just listen for fun. --- High win rate ≠ making a lot of money; this guy's position management is also top-notch. --- Individual traders are still debating the BTC and ETH ratio, but institutions have long been deploying even crazier stuff.

View OriginalReply0

InscriptionGriller

· 4h ago

Oops, an 84% win rate? Brother, that number sounds a bit suspicious... Nine out of ten trades end in failure, so why is he so steady? Either he's really experienced, or there's a funding pool backing this account. I bet five bucks.

View OriginalReply0

MoonRocketTeam

· 4h ago

Wow, a monthly win rate of 84.21%? This guy's booster is probably filled with fuel. My gains are nothing compared to theirs...

View OriginalReply0