2026-01-18 11:23:21

Large language models will automatically infer structures without explicit guidance — this is a problem that needs to be acknowledged. If you agree with this premise, then choosing not to provide appropriate guiding frameworks is not a neutral act. In fact, this effectively introduces a variable ethical risk factor. How to design safety measures for the system and how to establish reasonable constraints on AI behavior are all related to the long-term credibility of technological applications.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

digital_archaeologist

· 8h ago

Not providing a framework itself is a framework, this logic is brilliant.

View OriginalReply0

TokenAlchemist

· 8h ago

nah this is just framing problem dressed up as ethics discourse... llms gonna inference patterns regardless, the real alpha is understanding *which* inference vectors matter for your use case, not pretending constraint mechanisms are neutral either lol

Reply0

PhantomHunter

· 8h ago

To be honest, the logic of "neutrality is security" is fundamentally flawed.

View OriginalReply0