Recently, I saw a community project promoting a weighted dividend distribution model. The core selling points are threefold: payment ability, ecosystem implementation, and earning by holding tokens. It sounds a bit like a套路, but when broken down, the mechanism is actually quite interesting.

The profit structure is divided into five layers. First is the dual mining mechanism, involving two tokens linked together, with the project claiming that the value is anchored to only rise and not fall (this statement warrants a question mark). Then, there is a 1.5% dividend fee on buy and sell transactions, with 2.4% burned daily and 3% destroyed. Lastly, the weight reward part is split into 50% static and 50% dynamic, meaning that regardless of how users operate, static players can always earn.

The project emphasizes several points: never issuing additional tokens, no referral rewards, and no referral recruitment. On the LP side, it is described as "locked," and once development is complete, it will disappear. Funds are transparent and visible on a certain DEX, with no institutional background, private placements, or VC involvement. Structurally, there are no lock-ups or staking; funds can enter and exit freely.

The deflation plan is quite aggressive—aiming to burn down to 21,000 tokens. Coupled with the daily destruction and burning efforts, the project is betting on long-term deflation to push up the value. The official slogan is "Thousandfold foundation, ten-thousandfold takeoff." Such expectations are common in the crypto world, but few are actually realized.

Whether this gameplay can succeed ultimately depends on how long community consensus can be maintained. The weighted dividend model essentially allows token holders to exchange time for收益, but the prerequisite is that the project ecosystem must truly materialize, rather than relying solely on burning data to create a sense of scarcity.