While many DeFi projects are still struggling to survive, a leading lending platform on a top public chain has already started to pursue bigger ambitions with a locked-up scale of over $43 billion. Moving beyond the simple "pawnshop" model (over-collateralization), this time they aim to create an "on-chain financial department store."



The new strategy has two appealing directions. One is already underway—RWA (Real-World Assets). They are using USDT to purchase packaged US Treasury bond products, with an annualized yield of around 4%. It sounds simple but carries significant implications: directly bringing traditional financial stable returns onto the blockchain. In the current low-interest environment, this approach is indeed quite attractive.

The other is the real gamble—developing on-chain credit lending. The logic is ambitious: in the future, you won’t need collateral anymore; as long as your on-chain credit record is solid enough, you can borrow an unsecured loan. This essentially aims to disrupt the entire DeFi lending model.

There are two camps within the community. Supporters argue straightforwardly: with $43 billion in assets, there’s ample room for trial and error. Using stable income from RWA to fund new ventures is entirely feasible. Critics, however, point out that they are trying to do everything—exchanges, lending, prediction markets—stretching their resources too thin. If their focus is too divided, they might even lose the core advantage of lending.

Essentially, they are playing two different games. One seeks stability and income, earning through traffic and mature products like RWA; the other bets on the future, aiming to break into the uncharted territory of "credit loans." For investors, the most practical approach might be to first allocate some idle funds to experience the already established RWA financial products for stable returns. As for those grand future stories, it’s better to wait until real products and data are available before making decisions. In DeFi, surviving well is far more important than rushing to grow fast.
RWA0.93%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ColdWalletAnxietyvip
· 4h ago
$43 billion still want to play everything, this brother really dares to gamble. But to be honest, just the 4% from RWA is already attractive enough, much better than a bank's savings account.
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekConfessionvip
· 4h ago
$43 billion still dare to think about building a department store? Maybe it's just greed and overreach, trying to swallow the elephant.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhilosophervip
· 4h ago
$43 billion shop still wants to cover everything, I think this move is risky. The real pitfall is failing to protect the core business.
View OriginalReply0
NFTFreezervip
· 4h ago
$43 billion just to become an all-rounder, that's quite an appetite. But it feels like they're repeating the same old tricks; the promised disruption still ultimately relies on RWA to make a living.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentLossFanvip
· 4h ago
$43 billion wants to become a versatile player, but it feels a bit greedy... Isn't it more attractive to first earn a stable 4% return on RWA, instead of risking it all on the credit loan gamble?
View OriginalReply0
MetaDreamervip
· 4h ago
43 billion USD still want to do department stores? Feels a bit greedy, haha
View OriginalReply0
CountdownToBrokevip
· 4h ago
$43 billion just to play omnipotent—can such greed really be satisfied?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)