Decentralized storage has always been an awkward presence. The ideal is grand, but the reality is quite stark—In the Web3 ecosystem, most developers are still using centralized storage solutions, either due to faith issues or because they are more convenient and stable, which actually saves a lot of trouble.
But this phenomenon is being broken. Recently, I came across a project called Walrus, which has a pretty interesting approach: instead of playing the virtual decentralized narrative, it starts from the most practical pain points of developers—how to make decentralized storage truly user-friendly, stable, and reliable.
From a technical perspective, Walrus is built on the Sui blockchain and uses blob storage to handle large-scale data. The secret lies in erasure coding technology—after slicing files, dispersing them across network nodes. Even if some nodes go offline, the data can still be recovered. What does this mean for developers? Fewer failure points, lower risk of chain splits, and no more being tied to centralized cloud services. This is not just theoretical decentralization; it’s a thorough realization of usability and controllability at the engineering design level.
WAL is the native token of this protocol. It not only provides economic incentives but also takes on governance and staking functions. This is especially important—if the entire infrastructure is monopolized by a single company, decentralization becomes just an empty phrase. A truly vibrant protocol requires diverse participation and checks and balances.
In the long run, if the Sui ecosystem continues to grow, Walrus is likely to evolve into the default storage option, especially for applications that require long-term stability and privacy protection. The best protocols are often the most understated—not the ones that boast the loudest, but those that developers find most intuitive to use. From this perspective, Walrus seems to be on that path.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BearMarketSurvivor
· 4h ago
The erasure coding technology is indeed impressive, but can it really be implemented at scale?
---
It sounds good, but it still depends on whether the Sui ecosystem can hold up.
---
I'm not into hype; I like this attitude much more than those who boast every day.
---
For developers, ease of use is the key; everything else is just talk.
---
WAL's governance design is indeed innovative, but does it have enough liquidity?
---
Nodes can go offline and still recover; if this can truly be achieved, it will change the game.
---
It feels like another Sui story, but I'm worried the ecosystem might not be as optimistic as imagined.
---
Starting from pain points, this approach is much more realistic than those projects that just shout about decentralization.
---
Long-term stability sounds good, but the real question is how to make money in the short term.
---
The feeling of being hostage to cloud services is too deep; Walrus is the right direction.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropATM
· 4h ago
Erasure coding indeed addresses the pain points, but can Walrus survive? The Sui ecosystem still depends on what comes next.
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdvice
· 4h ago
Erasure coding is really powerful; even if a node goes down, it can still be recovered. That's true decentralization, not just talk.
View OriginalReply0
PessimisticOracle
· 4h ago
Erasure coding sounds pretty impressive, but when it comes to production environment? It still depends on whether Sui can handle it. Otherwise, no matter how stable it is, it's useless.
Decentralized storage has always been an awkward presence. The ideal is grand, but the reality is quite stark—In the Web3 ecosystem, most developers are still using centralized storage solutions, either due to faith issues or because they are more convenient and stable, which actually saves a lot of trouble.
But this phenomenon is being broken. Recently, I came across a project called Walrus, which has a pretty interesting approach: instead of playing the virtual decentralized narrative, it starts from the most practical pain points of developers—how to make decentralized storage truly user-friendly, stable, and reliable.
From a technical perspective, Walrus is built on the Sui blockchain and uses blob storage to handle large-scale data. The secret lies in erasure coding technology—after slicing files, dispersing them across network nodes. Even if some nodes go offline, the data can still be recovered. What does this mean for developers? Fewer failure points, lower risk of chain splits, and no more being tied to centralized cloud services. This is not just theoretical decentralization; it’s a thorough realization of usability and controllability at the engineering design level.
WAL is the native token of this protocol. It not only provides economic incentives but also takes on governance and staking functions. This is especially important—if the entire infrastructure is monopolized by a single company, decentralization becomes just an empty phrase. A truly vibrant protocol requires diverse participation and checks and balances.
In the long run, if the Sui ecosystem continues to grow, Walrus is likely to evolve into the default storage option, especially for applications that require long-term stability and privacy protection. The best protocols are often the most understated—not the ones that boast the loudest, but those that developers find most intuitive to use. From this perspective, Walrus seems to be on that path.