Every link in the ecosystem chain depends on the adjacent links for support. Wolves eat sheep, sheep eat grass, and grass needs sunlight. Remove any one part, and the entire system collapses.
Digital finance is also following this path. Technology drives application implementation, privacy wins user trust, compliance frameworks connect with the real world, and user participation is necessary to activate the market. It sounds smooth, but in reality, it’s a covert battle—privacy and compliance are like two predators fighting for survival space, resulting in an increasingly fragile chain. Many are forced into a dead end: either exposing flaws under transparency or hiding in the dark to evade regulation. Neither option is acceptable.
Since 2018, Dusk has been pondering one question: can privacy and compliance no longer be opposed? It is a complete Layer 1 blockchain infrastructure, with a simple core idea—these two elements do not have to be predator and prey in the food chain; they can actually promote each other.
**Modular architecture is the foundation**
For any ecosystem to last, the underlying layer must be flexible and diverse. Dusk’s approach is to break down those complex blockchain components—consensus mechanisms, transaction execution, privacy protection, fund settlement—into independent modules that can be freely combined. Developers have a box of building blocks, and can assemble whatever they want.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AlwaysQuestioning
· 5h ago
Can privacy and compliance truly be non-conflicting? It sounds ideal, but in practice, can Dusk's modular approach really address the fundamental issues of ecosystem fragility?
View OriginalReply0
NestedFox
· 5h ago
That sounds nice, but can privacy and compliance really be reconciled? I feel like someone still has to make compromises.
View OriginalReply0
EntryPositionAnalyst
· 5h ago
Can privacy and compliance really be reconciled? Is it reliable... Wait, the idea of modular building blocks is indeed interesting.
View OriginalReply0
HorizonHunter
· 5h ago
Well said. The issue of privacy and compliance constraining each other is indeed a deadlock. However, Dusk's modular approach sounds interesting; it feels like an attempt to solve the problem fundamentally rather than taking sides.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrybaby
· 5h ago
Privacy and compliance have to be at odds? I don't quite understand this sword, but Dusk's modular approach is somewhat interesting... However, whether it can truly solve the problem depends on how it is implemented in practice.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrying
· 5h ago
Another "perfect solution" story. Can privacy and compliance truly coexist? I feel like someone still has to suffer.
View OriginalReply0
ZkSnarker
· 6h ago
well technically the "privacy vs compliance" framing is already outdated... Dusk's modular thing is interesting but imagine if we actually had ZK proofs doing the heavy lifting here—you don't need to choose sides, that's the whole point
Every link in the ecosystem chain depends on the adjacent links for support. Wolves eat sheep, sheep eat grass, and grass needs sunlight. Remove any one part, and the entire system collapses.
Digital finance is also following this path. Technology drives application implementation, privacy wins user trust, compliance frameworks connect with the real world, and user participation is necessary to activate the market. It sounds smooth, but in reality, it’s a covert battle—privacy and compliance are like two predators fighting for survival space, resulting in an increasingly fragile chain. Many are forced into a dead end: either exposing flaws under transparency or hiding in the dark to evade regulation. Neither option is acceptable.
Since 2018, Dusk has been pondering one question: can privacy and compliance no longer be opposed? It is a complete Layer 1 blockchain infrastructure, with a simple core idea—these two elements do not have to be predator and prey in the food chain; they can actually promote each other.
**Modular architecture is the foundation**
For any ecosystem to last, the underlying layer must be flexible and diverse. Dusk’s approach is to break down those complex blockchain components—consensus mechanisms, transaction execution, privacy protection, fund settlement—into independent modules that can be freely combined. Developers have a box of building blocks, and can assemble whatever they want.