Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
How the technical fail of Linea cost us $10,000: an analysis of the exit strategy
The Linea project experienced a significant fail during a key event launch, which led to the failure of expected profits. Instead of the planned $10,000 profit, a position had to be closed at a loss. This event demonstrates the critical importance of strict risk management when working with new blockchain projects.
Where the problem started: a technical error in the mechanics of the claim
The Linea team made a critical mistake during the token distribution preparation stage. Instead of a smooth technical launch with all parameters met, a failure occurred in the mechanics of the claim. This created the first imbalance — on the Android platform, everything was ready for normal operation, but at the protocol level, a critical error arose that jeopardized the entire event.
Such technical failures at the launch stage are often the result of insufficient testing or developers rushing to implement updates.
Apple Store as an aggravating factor in the crash of the event
Then, what finally destroyed the timing of the event happened. While the Android system was ready, the Apple Store requires 24-42 hours to review each app update. This well-known limitation had a catastrophic impact on the synchronization of the launch.
As a result, a significant imbalance arose between the platforms: Android gained access earlier, while Apple users were left waiting. This unsynchronized launch disrupted the natural course of the event and created suboptimal market conditions at a time when the element of surprise could maximize profit.
Why closing in a loss is the right move
The initial analysis was correct: under normal circumstances, a +$10,000 net profit could have been achieved. However, the market does not wait for perfect conditions, and when the plan falls apart — immediate action is necessary.
I closed the position according to my risk management strategy. This is a key principle of professional trading: when an event deviates from the scenario, it’s better to limit losses to a small negative than to hope for a miracle and sit through a chaotic trade.
A small loss according to risk management rules is not a defeat; it’s a professional decision. A 5-10% drop upon closing is preferable to potential 50% losses trying to wait for recovery.
What this fail teaches us
The analytical approach was correct, but neither technical analysis nor fundamental research can predict team errors or App Store peculiarities. These are external factors beyond the scope of controlled analysis.
We do not gamble on randomness; we do not catch falling situations without a clear scenario. We only enter highly reliable events with a high probability of success and predefined exit points.
This Linea event is a valuable lesson in the portfolio of experience. The next entry will be better prepared, and the probability of success will be even higher. Discipline and a systematic approach to capital management are what separate a loss from bankruptcy.