🇺🇸📊 #WhiteHouseTalksStablecoinYields — Latest Update (11 Feb 2026)

The White House has just wrapped up a second major meeting between U.S. policymakers, banking leaders, and crypto industry representatives on stablecoin yield rules, and once again no final deal has been reached — though progress in the discussions was noted.
🔹 Core Dispute:
Banks and crypto firms clashed over whether stablecoin issuers should be allowed to pay yield or rewards to holders. Banks are pushing for strict limitations or prohibitions on yield tied to stablecoins, arguing that high yields could draw deposits away from traditional banks and damage the banking system. Crypto advocates counter that yield is essential for competitive digital finance and on-chain liquidity.
🔹 Meeting Outcome:
• The meeting was described by participants as “productive” but ended without agreement, keeping the negotiations unresolved.
• Banks presented formal “prohibition principles” outlining strict boundaries on yield offerings.
• A notable shift: banks signaled some openness to narrow exemptions for specific reward types, such as transaction-based incentives, which was not previously on the table.
🔹 Legislative Implications:
The yield dispute remains one of the biggest sticking points in the stalled U.S. Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (CLARITY Act). Without clear language reconciling both sides’ positions, the bill’s progress through the Senate is uncertain, and regulatory certainty for stablecoins may be delayed further.
📌 What This Means for Markets:
• Stablecoin platforms may continue offering current yield products while rules remain unresolved.
• Delay in regulatory clarity could impact stablecoin adoption, DeFi liquidity, and institutional participation.
• A March 1 deadline has been floated for stakeholders to reach a compromise on language that could unlock broader market structure legislation.
‍#WhiteHouseTalksStablecoinYields #StablecoinRegulation