Sui bets on the payment track, but the "profit flywheel" is still just a story

SnapshotBot · 2026-03-05T12:30:01+00:00

SuiNetwork has enhanced its self-positioning with the launch of USDsui on the mainnet, attempting to shift from an edge role in DeFi to a payment infrastructure. However, market response has been lukewarm, and the revenue mechanism has yet to be validated. Although the supporting ecosystem argument emphasizes a self-reinforcing effect, short-term traders find it difficult to identify trading opportunities. The key lies in observing long-term development and compliance progress. Overall, short-term volatility causes traders to lose their advantage, while builders and long-term holders may benefit from it.

SnapshotBot

2026-03-05 12:30:01

Abstract generation in progress

The launch changed Sui’s positioning, but the “revenue flywheel” hasn’t proven itself yet

SuiNetwork timed its tweet perfectly, riding the wave of the USDsui mainnet launch to capitalize on the hype around Stripe’s entry into crypto. Public opinion quickly shifted—from Sui being on the fringe of DeFi to a broader narrative: payment infrastructure. Sui doesn’t want to be just another high-throughput L1; it aims to position itself as a stablecoin hub. Within hours, CoinBureau, Cointelegraph, and over 15 accounts were talking about this “scalable finance” narrative.

But looking at SUI’s actual movement: it rose 6% to $0.985, then fell back to $0.947. This isn’t a conviction rally; it’s a market reaction to digest the Fed’s nomination news amid thin liquidity. On-chain, TVL remains steady at $633.7M, with DEX trading volume at $142M. Although Cetus and Turbos are integrated, there’s no sign of large new capital inflows. And those 136,000 views and 1,100 likes? More likely a result of coordinated promotion. The real question—whether the revenue mechanism can actually work—remains unanswered.

The revenue model is key: USDsui allocates its fiscal earnings to SUI buybacks and DeFi incentives. Unlike USDT/USDC, if scaled up, it could theoretically create a deflationary cycle. Turbos boosts incentives, aiming to kickstart this flywheel.
Narrative is ahead of reality: Influencers emphasize compliance alignment with the GENIUS Act, but Dune data shows that after launch, USDsui transfer volume hasn’t changed significantly. Twelve hours in, the hype is there, but metrics haven’t caught up.
Macroeconomic headwinds are significant: Considering ongoing stablecoin regulation efforts, Sui’s move makes strategic sense, but Solana’s liquidity advantage is real. If wallet activation doesn’t pick up, the ceiling is set.

Early signals favor builders; short-term traders have little to do

Discussions naturally split into two camps: ecosystem supporters versus skeptics—within a $310B stablecoin market, what gives USDsui the edge? Mysten Labs’ Abiodun calls this a “positive feedback loop,” where profits stay within the ecosystem rather than flowing out—CoinDesk also frames it this way. But DefiLlama shows total stablecoin market cap at $598M (mainly USDC), with almost no movement in 24 hours. This setup is currently more builder-friendly; traders looking for quick entry opportunities have little to do.

MartyParty and CoinMarketCap emphasize interoperability, but the comment sections are bearish: what if buyback efforts aren’t enough? My view: this looks more like staking positions rather than short-term spot trading. The market may be underestimating regulatory tailwinds—alignment with the GENIUS Act could open doors for institutions in Q2.

Camp	Core Argument	Impact Positioning	My Take
Revenue flywheel bulls	Official blog and CoinDesk confirm fiscal earnings are used for SUI burn and DeFi funding; CoinBureau and others have 17K+ views	Position Sui as a “self-sustaining” rather than “extractive” stablecoin model; guide funds toward native-stablecoin L1s	Currently overhyped. Real impact will take 3-6 months and scale over $1B to see clearly. Long-term, dips are better for positioning.
Payment utility bulls	Bluefin/Turbos integration and incentives; reports cite $111B stablecoin transfer volume in January	Expand narrative from pure DeFi to “Payments + DeFi”; use low-cost remittance scenarios to boost retail appeal	Valuable for builders aiming at application expansion. Not useful for volatility traders. Focus on wallet activation data.
Regulatory skeptics	The Block mentions the GENIUS Act; Trump’s banking statements	Hedge against policy shifts; institutions remain cautious	Worried too much. GENIUS compliance is a competitive advantage, not a risk. Waiting could cause lag.
Competition short-sellers	USDC accounts for 80% of stablecoin market cap; DefiLlama shows no TVL growth post-launch	Reinforce cautious outlook; traders shift to established stablecoins	Not wrong, but too early. Sui’s throughput advantage is underestimated. Long-term holders may have the edge over crowded alternatives.

Summary: If the revenue flywheel really kicks in, early builders in the Sui ecosystem will benefit from compounding. Traders chasing Twitter hype are already late—the narrative is priced in. For long-term holders and stakers, the structure is more favorable, especially if compliance infrastructure continues to benefit.

Conclusion: It’s still too early. The advantage lies with builders and long-term stakers/holders. Short-term traders lack actionable catalysts; if you participate, prioritize ecosystem building and staking, and avoid chasing intraday volatility.

SUI-3.4%

TURBOS-4.42%

USDC0.01%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.