Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Futures Kickoff
Get prepared for your futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to experience risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
The political confrontation surrounding Milei's speech and the legislative reforms that define the country's direction
In a climate of extreme political tension, Javier Milei’s government is pushing an aggressive legislative package that includes labor reform and changes to the juvenile criminal system, while the opposition raises their voices with devastating criticism. The parliamentary debate that swept the country in early 2025 reflects a deep divide between Casa Rosada and critical sectors, especially personified in the incendiary words of Deputy Juan Grabois.
Grabois’s frontal attack on labor reform
The social leader and legislator for Unión por la Patria delivered a speech full of harshness against the labor flexibilization bill that received half approval in the Senate. In his words, Grabois linked the libertarian initiative with disastrous economic policies from Argentina’s past, generating a comparison that resonated through the corridors of Congress.
“In 2001, a labor reform similar to what the government wants to implement now was made. Those in power lost it and cowardly fled in helicopters. If we want Javier Milei to finish his term, we ask him not to pass that reform, because they are so useless they will end up leaving in helicopters like Patricia Bullrich,” Grabois stated, making a veiled reference to Argentina’s history and warning about the potential consequences of such policies.
The legislator also directly targeted libertarians with accusations of links to drug trafficking, stating that “anarcho-capitalism is narco-capitalism.” Specifically, he referred to former deputy José Luis Espert and legislator Lorena Villaverde, both questioned in that regard.
The labor reform bill: what changes for workers
The Senate approved the bill with 42 votes in favor and 30 against after a marathon debate lasting over 12 hours. Federico Sturzenegger, Minister of Deregulation and State Transformation, considered it a “historic day,” the first time since the return to democracy that a reform of this magnitude has become law.
Key changes include a radical overhaul of how severance pay is calculated, flexibilization of wage payment modalities, and the introduction of the concept of “dynamic salary” negotiable based on performance. The new regime allows wages to be paid not only in money but also in kind, housing, or food, and opens the possibility of “merit-based bonuses” and productivity incentives.
Regarding severance, the proposal reduces the calculation base by excluding concepts such as vacations, Christmas bonuses, tips, or awards. A cap is set at no more than three times the worker’s average monthly salary, with updates for inflation plus a 3% annual bonus. For large companies, judgments can be paid in six monthly installments, while for SMEs, the term extends to twelve installments.
The opposition raises its voices: “No comprehensive plan”
Beyond Grabois, multiple opposition legislators expressed concerns about the reform. Deputy Jorge Taiana, also from Unión por la Patria, criticized the half approval, stating that the project “criminalizes the most vulnerable youth” without offering an integral response to the issue. “Prevention, protection, care measures are not considered, nor are the resources for specialized personnel,” he denounced.
Miguel Ángel Pichetto, from Encuentro Federal, also warned that the reform lacks government investment in infrastructure, education, and service repair. “This is a superficial measure that serves to showcase certain senators and ministers,” he said, indirectly referring to Patricia Bullrich, former Security Minister and current head of the ruling bench in the Senate.
The juvenile criminal reform: the second legislative front
Alongside the labor debate, the Chamber of Deputies processed a bill to lower the age of criminal responsibility from 16 to 14. With 149 votes in favor and 100 against, the government achieved half approval of the new juvenile criminal system, sparking an equally intense confrontation in the chamber.
Supporters like Gabriel Bornoroni, leader of La Libertad Avanza, argued that “a state that does not intervene is a state that abandons,” insisting that judges be empowered to ensure victims are protected. However, child rights experts opposed the measure, highlighting that it does not include resocialization or prevention policies.
Nicolás del Caño, from FIT-Unity, stated that his bloc “will outright reject” the law, arguing that national and international statistics show it does not solve the problem but worsens it. Buenos Aires governor Axel Kicillof also criticized, saying “security is not improved with austerity or magic solutions, but with a state that invests more and better.”
Public opinion support: a factor in favor of the government
One element the government uses as justification is broad survey support. According to Opinaia, 80% of Argentinians agree with lowering the age of criminal responsibility: 67% are “strongly agree” and 14% are “somewhat agree.” This cross-sectional support reaches 95% among voters of La Libertad Avanza and 96% among those who chose Provincias Unidas.
Mercosur-EU agreement: an additional legislative victory
In the same context, the Chamber of Deputies ratified the Mercosur-European Union agreement with 203 votes in favor and 32 against, enabling the creation of the world’s largest free trade zone. Signed in January in Asunción, Paraguay, this treaty marks another legislative win for the executive in its transformation agenda.
Internal dynamics of the ruling coalition: blind obedience or legislative debate?
A revealing aspect of these debates was the internal dynamic within La Libertad Avanza. It was reported that the Secretary General of the Presidency made a statement to libertarian deputies that summarizes the government’s approach: “First, the projects of the Executive are voted on, then they are read.” The message suggests that legislators are there to obey orders rather than to exercise critical thinking or substantively debate initiatives.
According to reports of a meeting between the President’s sister and about 50 La Libertad Avanza deputies at a restaurant in Villa Urquiza, the diners applauded this statement. The government issued no denial regarding these details revealed by some of the attendees.
Parliamentary clashes: a reflection of political tension
During the juvenile criminal reform debate, multiple heated exchanges occurred. Horacio Pietragalla, from Unión por la Patria, interrupted libertarian Nicolás Mayoraz shouting “¡Caradura!”, leading to an immediate clash. Deputies Karen Reichardt (LLA) and Myriam Bregman (opposition) also clashed on social media when the former shared a provocative photo against the left-wing bench.
Cristian Ritondo, from the Pro bloc, pointed out an apparent contradiction by quoting a fragment of Pietragalla’s speech out of context. Although Ritondo interpreted the words as a defense of delinquency, Deputy Paula Penacca clarified that Pietragalla was quoting a book by César González, recounting his life experience related to crime and prison, without representing the position of the Peronist bloc.
The nuanced position of Frente Renovador
Within the opposition coalition Unión por la Patria, an important distinction emerged. While Kirchnerism outright rejected the juvenile criminal reform, Frente Renovador of Sergio Massa chose to carve out its own stance. The Massa bloc agrees with lowering the age to 14 but questions the methodology, demanding that the change be part of a comprehensive reform of the Penal Code rather than an isolated regime. This position would lead them to abstain in the general vote, though they would support the specific article on the new minimum age.
Street incidents: repression and arrests in protests against labor reform
Legislative debates were mirrored by street protests. A large demonstration against the labor reform resulted in various incidents near Congress. At least 54 of the 71 detainees were released after questioning. Official reports state that 51 arrests were made by federal forces and 20 by the City Police. The 14 still detained were distributed among 10 men at the Suárez Admission and Referral Center in Barracas and four women at the Palermo women’s detention center.
Government strategy: consolidating majorities and projecting power
With these votes, Milei’s government consolidated its ability to advance its legislative agenda. The numerical configuration in the Chamber allowed the executive to combine support from strategic allies (Pro, UCR, MID) with backing from blocs like Provincias Unidas, Federal Innovation, and the Production and Work space.
Patricia Bullrich, head of the ruling bench in the Senate, explained that during negotiations on the labor reform, “the CGT was invited to meetings and made several proposals,” and that the government “took those we found reasonable.” This characterization was rejected by critics, who argue that the labor union was marginalized from the real decision-making process.
Looking ahead: the debate on the role of the State
What is evident in these legislative confrontations is a fundamental dispute over the conception of the State’s role in Argentina. While Milei’s government advocates deregulation, flexibilization, and less state intervention, critical sectors warn that these policies deepen social vulnerabilities, especially among the most precarious workers and youth from popular sectors.
Grabois, in particular, warned that the reform package reproduces historical errors that have caused crises in the past. His criticism points out that the libertarian capitalism promoted by the government is not a solution but an aggravation of structural problems. Meanwhile, experts and opposition legislators insist that reforms require comprehensive policies in education, prevention, and social investment.
The political confrontation that marked these legislative debates suggests the country faces a defining moment regarding its development model. Future legislative stages, including the Senate’s consideration of juvenile criminal reform and other projects, will continue to be arenas of this fundamental dispute.