Introduction: L1 vs NEAR Investment Comparison
In the cryptocurrency market, the comparison between Lamina1 vs NEAR has been an unavoidable topic for investors. The two not only show significant differences in market cap ranking, application scenarios, and price performance but also represent different positioning in crypto assets.
Lamina1 (L1): Since its launch, it has gained market recognition for its focus on IP incubation, distribution, and monetization.
NEAR (NEAR): Introduced in 2020, it has been hailed as a highly scalable protocol for supporting DApp operations on mobile devices, and is one of the cryptocurrencies with significant global trading volume and market capitalization.
This article will comprehensively analyze the investment value comparison between Lamina1 and NEAR, focusing on historical price trends, supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, technological ecosystems, and future predictions, attempting to answer the question investors care about most:
"Which is the better buy right now?"
Here is the report section based on the provided template and information:
I. Price History Comparison and Current Market Status
Lamina1 (L1) and NEAR (NEAR) Historical Price Trends
- 2024: Lamina1 launched, with its price reaching a high of $0.9.
- 2022: NEAR reached its all-time high of $20.44 in January, likely due to overall crypto market enthusiasm.
- Comparative analysis: In the recent market cycle, Lamina1 dropped from its high of $0.9 to a low of $0.004306, while NEAR declined from $20.44 to a low of $0.526762.
Current Market Situation (2025-11-03)
- Lamina1 current price: $0.006501
- NEAR current price: $2.006
- 24-hour trading volume: $19,306.20 (L1) vs $3,398,923.87 (NEAR)
- Market Sentiment Index (Fear & Greed Index): 42 (Fear)
Click to view real-time prices:

II. Key Factors Influencing L1 vs NEAR Investment Value
Technical Maturity and Ecosystem Activity
- NEAR: Mature technology with active ecosystem, deeply supported by mainstream capital
- L1 Tokens: Value assessment involves not just revenue, but also speculation, narratives and future expectations
- 📌 Historical Pattern: Projects with mature technology and active ecosystems tend to show better long-term value stability
Strategic Focus and Innovation Drivers
- NEAR: Recently pivoted focus toward AI and on-chain applications, reaching year-to-date highs in March
- L1 Tokens: Face increasing competition from L2 solutions, particularly with Ethereum's shift to Rollup solutions
- Market Performance: NEAR has been one of the best performing L1 tokens this year
Development Experience and Scalability
- NEAR: Core goal is simplifying blockchain development experience while solving scalability issues
- Performance: Offers high-performance blockchain technology with low transaction costs
- Investment Strategy: NEAR favors high-performance blockchain and Web3 ecosystem expansion with substantial funding
Ecosystem Applications and Services
- NEAR: Features Ref Finance, the largest AMM on NEAR with $16.87M TVL enabling spot and leveraged trading
- User Experience: Provides low transaction costs for various trading activities
- Growth Potential: Shows significant growth and explosive potential for mid to long-term holders
III. 2025-2030 Price Prediction: L1 vs NEAR
Short-term Prediction (2025)
- L1: Conservative $0.00459228 - $0.006468 | Optimistic $0.006468 - $0.00672672
- NEAR: Conservative $1.16348 - $2.006 | Optimistic $2.006 - $2.14642
Mid-term Prediction (2027)
- L1 may enter a growth phase, with expected prices ranging from $0.0039914028 to $0.01008736344
- NEAR may enter a consolidation phase, with expected prices ranging from $1.452516516 to $2.288813904
- Key drivers: Institutional inflows, ETF developments, ecosystem growth
Long-term Prediction (2030)
- L1: Base scenario $0.006901013521987 - $0.009858590745696 | Optimistic scenario $0.009858590745696 - $0.01232323843212
- NEAR: Base scenario $1.635539803222932 - $3.0859241570244 | Optimistic scenario $3.0859241570244 - $3.24022036487562
View detailed price predictions for L1 and NEAR
Disclaimer
L1:
| 年份 |
预测最高价 |
预测平均价格 |
预测最低价 |
涨跌幅 |
| 2025 |
0.00672672 |
0.006468 |
0.00459228 |
0 |
| 2026 |
0.007916832 |
0.00659736 |
0.0034966008 |
1 |
| 2027 |
0.01008736344 |
0.007257096 |
0.0039914028 |
11 |
| 2028 |
0.0107535648528 |
0.00867222972 |
0.0078917290452 |
33 |
| 2029 |
0.010004284204992 |
0.0097128972864 |
0.005536351453248 |
49 |
| 2030 |
0.01232323843212 |
0.009858590745696 |
0.006901013521987 |
51 |
NEAR:
| 年份 |
预测最高价 |
预测平均价格 |
预测最低价 |
涨跌幅 |
| 2025 |
2.14642 |
2.006 |
1.16348 |
0 |
| 2026 |
2.3253552 |
2.07621 |
1.5779196 |
3 |
| 2027 |
2.288813904 |
2.2007826 |
1.452516516 |
9 |
| 2028 |
2.98558167516 |
2.244798252 |
2.04276640932 |
11 |
| 2029 |
3.5566583504688 |
2.61518996358 |
1.5952658777838 |
30 |
| 2030 |
3.24022036487562 |
3.0859241570244 |
1.635539803222932 |
53 |
IV. Investment Strategy Comparison: L1 vs NEAR
Long-term vs Short-term Investment Strategy
- L1: Suitable for investors focused on IP monetization and ecosystem potential
- NEAR: Suitable for investors seeking established ecosystems and Web3 expansion
Risk Management and Asset Allocation
- Conservative investors: L1: 20% vs NEAR: 80%
- Aggressive investors: L1: 40% vs NEAR: 60%
- Hedging tools: Stablecoin allocation, options, cross-currency portfolios
V. Potential Risk Comparison
Market Risk
- L1: Higher volatility due to newer market presence
- NEAR: Susceptible to overall crypto market trends
Technical Risk
- L1: Scalability, network stability
- NEAR: Computing power concentration, security vulnerabilities
Regulatory Risk
- Global regulatory policies may have differing impacts on both tokens
VI. Conclusion: Which Is the Better Buy?
📌 Investment Value Summary:
- L1 advantages: Focus on IP incubation and monetization, potential for growth in niche market
- NEAR advantages: Established ecosystem, active development, focus on AI and on-chain applications
✅ Investment Advice:
- New investors: Consider a higher allocation to NEAR due to its established presence
- Experienced investors: Balanced approach with both L1 and NEAR, adjusting based on risk tolerance
- Institutional investors: NEAR may be more suitable due to its market cap and ecosystem maturity
⚠️ Risk Warning: The cryptocurrency market is highly volatile. This article does not constitute investment advice.
None
VII. FAQ
Q1: What are the main differences between Lamina1 and NEAR?
A: Lamina1 focuses on IP incubation, distribution, and monetization, while NEAR is a highly scalable protocol for supporting DApp operations on mobile devices. NEAR has a more established ecosystem and larger market cap, while Lamina1 is newer with potential for growth in its niche market.
Q2: Which token has shown better price performance recently?
A: NEAR has been one of the best performing L1 tokens this year, reaching year-to-date highs in March. Lamina1, being newer, has shown more volatility but also potential for growth.
Q3: What are the key factors influencing the investment value of these tokens?
A: Key factors include technical maturity, ecosystem activity, strategic focus, innovation drivers, development experience, scalability, and ecosystem applications and services.
Q4: How do the price predictions for Lamina1 and NEAR compare for 2030?
A: For 2030, Lamina1's base scenario predicts $0.006901013521987 - $0.009858590745696, while NEAR's base scenario predicts $1.635539803222932 - $3.0859241570244.
Q5: What investment strategies are recommended for Lamina1 and NEAR?
A: For conservative investors, a 20% L1 to 80% NEAR allocation is suggested. For aggressive investors, a 40% L1 to 60% NEAR allocation is recommended. New investors might consider a higher allocation to NEAR due to its established presence.
Q6: What are the main risks associated with investing in these tokens?
A: Risks include market volatility, technical risks such as scalability and security vulnerabilities, and regulatory risks due to potential changes in global crypto policies.
Q7: Which token might be more suitable for institutional investors?
A: NEAR may be more suitable for institutional investors due to its larger market cap and more mature ecosystem.