MSN vs ICP: The Battle for Digital Dominance in China's Internet Landscape

Introduction: Investment Comparison of MSN vs ICP

In the cryptocurrency market, the comparison between Meson Network (MSN) and Internet Computer (ICP) has been an unavoidable topic for investors. The two not only differ significantly in market cap ranking, application scenarios, and price performance but also represent different positioning in the crypto asset space.

Meson Network (MSN): Launched with the aim of creating an efficient bandwidth marketplace on Web3, using blockchain protocol to monetize idle bandwidth from long-tail users.

Internet Computer (ICP): Introduced as a first-layer protocol designed to develop a decentralized public network for large-scale smart contract execution, aiming to become the "World Computer."

This article will comprehensively analyze the investment value comparison between MSN and ICP, focusing on historical price trends, supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, technological ecosystems, and future predictions, attempting to answer the question investors care about most:

"Which is the better buy right now?"

I. Price History Comparison and Current Market Status

Meson Network (MSN) and Internet Computer (ICP) Historical Price Trends

• 2024: MSN launched with an initial price of $1.75, experiencing significant volatility.
• 2021: ICP reached its all-time high of $700.65 shortly after launch, followed by a sharp decline.
• Comparative analysis: During the recent market cycle, MSN dropped from its all-time high of $13.638 to a low of $0.007028, while ICP declined from $700.65 to $2.23.

Current Market Situation (2025-11-01)

• MSN current price: $0.008414
• ICP current price: $3.023
• 24-hour trading volume: MSN $28,121 vs ICP $1,144,829
• Market Sentiment Index (Fear & Greed Index): 33 (Fear)

Click to view real-time prices:

• View MSN current price Market Price
• View ICP current price Market Price

II. Core Factors Affecting MSN vs ICP Investment Value

Supply Mechanisms Comparison (Tokenomics)

• MSN: Based on the available information, the supply mechanism for MSN is not clearly defined in the provided materials.
• ICP: The supply mechanism details for ICP are not explicitly mentioned in the reference materials.
• 📌 Historical Pattern: There is insufficient data in the provided materials to determine how supply mechanisms drive price cycle changes.

Institutional Adoption and Market Applications

• Institutional Holdings: The materials do not provide specific information about institutional preferences between MSN and ICP.
• Enterprise Adoption: According to the reference materials, internet companies like Tencent, Baidu, Google, and Facebook have developed various online platforms and services, but specific applications of MSN/ICP in cross-border payments, settlements, or investment portfolios are not mentioned.
• Regulatory Attitudes: The reference materials do not detail different countries' regulatory attitudes toward these assets.

Technical Development and Ecosystem Building

• Technical innovations and continuous development appear to be important factors for internet companies, as mentioned in the context of SCHWEIZER's strategy focused on innovation and expertise.
• The materials mention various components of the internet ecosystem including cloud computing, big data, artificial intelligence, and mobile internet, but specific technical upgrades for MSN or ICP are not detailed.
• The reference information highlights that companies like Tencent provide comprehensive internet services including value-added services, advertising, and e-commerce, demonstrating the importance of ecosystem development.

Macroeconomic and Market Cycles

• The materials mention that macroeconomic risk is one of the factors affecting internet companies, though specific anti-inflation properties of either MSN or ICP are not discussed.
• There is a reference to market factors affecting investment value, with the materials noting that both long-term investment trends and short-term market fluctuations should be considered.
• The reference information indicates that timing of investments in China has a significant impact, suggesting that market cycles and timing are important factors to consider when evaluating investment value. III. 2025-2030 Price Prediction: MSN vs ICP

Short-term Prediction (2025)

• MSN: Conservative $0.00686 - $0.00915 | Optimistic $0.00915 - $0.01226
• ICP: Conservative $2.55 - $3.04 | Optimistic $3.04 - $3.65

Mid-term Prediction (2027)

• MSN may enter a growth phase, with estimated price range $0.00760 - $0.01498
• ICP may enter a bullish market, with estimated price range $3.13 - $4.78
• Key drivers: Institutional capital inflow, ETF, ecosystem development

Long-term Prediction (2030)

• MSN: Base scenario $0.01887 - $0.02416 | Optimistic scenario $0.02416 - $0.02900
• ICP: Base scenario $5.24 - $7.70 | Optimistic scenario $7.70 - $9.24

View detailed price predictions for MSN and ICP

Disclaimer: The above predictions are based on historical data and market analysis. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile and subject to various unpredictable factors. These projections should not be considered as financial advice. Always conduct your own research before making investment decisions.

MSN:

ICP:

IV. Investment Strategy Comparison: MSN vs ICP

Long-term vs Short-term Investment Strategy

• MSN: Suitable for investors focusing on Web3 bandwidth marketplace potential
• ICP: Suitable for investors interested in decentralized computing infrastructure

Risk Management and Asset Allocation

• Conservative investors: MSN: 20% vs ICP: 80%
• Aggressive investors: MSN: 40% vs ICP: 60%
• Hedging tools: Stablecoin allocation, options, cross-currency portfolios

V. Potential Risk Comparison

Market Risk

• MSN: Higher volatility due to smaller market cap
• ICP: Susceptible to broader crypto market trends

Technical Risk

• MSN: Scalability, network stability
• ICP: Computational power concentration, security vulnerabilities

Regulatory Risk

• Global regulatory policies may have differing impacts on both assets

VI. Conclusion: Which Is the Better Buy?

📌 Investment Value Summary:

• MSN advantages: Niche market in Web3 bandwidth, potential for growth
• ICP advantages: Established project, broader ecosystem, higher liquidity

✅ Investment Advice:

• Novice investors: Consider allocating a small portion to ICP for exposure to decentralized computing
• Experienced investors: Balanced approach with both MSN and ICP, adjusting based on risk tolerance
• Institutional investors: Conduct thorough due diligence on both projects, potentially favoring ICP for its more established presence

⚠️ Risk Warning: Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile. This article does not constitute investment advice. None

VII. FAQ

Q1: What are the main differences between MSN and ICP? A: MSN aims to create an efficient bandwidth marketplace on Web3, while ICP is designed as a first-layer protocol for large-scale smart contract execution. MSN focuses on monetizing idle bandwidth, whereas ICP aims to become a "World Computer" for decentralized applications.

Q2: Which cryptocurrency has shown better price performance historically? A: Based on the provided information, ICP has shown more significant price movements. It reached an all-time high of $700.65 shortly after launch in 2021, while MSN's all-time high was $13.638. However, both have experienced substantial price declines since their peaks.

Q3: How do the current market situations of MSN and ICP compare? A: As of 2025-11-01, MSN's price is $0.008414 with a 24-hour trading volume of $28,121, while ICP's price is $3.023 with a 24-hour trading volume of $1,144,829. ICP appears to have higher liquidity and trading activity.

Q4: What are the key factors affecting the investment value of MSN and ICP? A: Key factors include supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, technical development, ecosystem building, and macroeconomic conditions. However, specific details for these factors were not fully provided in the reference materials.

Q5: What are the price predictions for MSN and ICP in 2030? A: For MSN, the base scenario predicts a price range of $0.01887 - $0.02416, with an optimistic scenario of $0.02416 - $0.02900. For ICP, the base scenario predicts $5.24 - $7.70, with an optimistic scenario of $7.70 - $9.24.

Q6: How should investors approach MSN and ICP in terms of risk management? A: Conservative investors might consider allocating 20% to MSN and 80% to ICP, while aggressive investors might opt for 40% MSN and 60% ICP. It's recommended to use hedging tools such as stablecoin allocation, options, and cross-currency portfolios.

Q7: What are the potential risks associated with investing in MSN and ICP? A: Both face market risks, with MSN potentially experiencing higher volatility due to its smaller market cap. Technical risks include scalability and network stability for MSN, and computational power concentration and security vulnerabilities for ICP. Both are also subject to regulatory risks depending on global policies.

Q8: Which cryptocurrency is considered the better buy? A: The choice depends on the investor's profile. Novice investors might consider ICP for its more established presence. Experienced investors could take a balanced approach with both MSN and ICP. Institutional investors are advised to conduct thorough due diligence, potentially favoring ICP for its more established ecosystem.