In the cryptocurrency market, the comparison between Tezos Domains (TED) vs Polkadot (DOT) has been an unavoidable topic for investors. The two not only show significant differences in market cap ranking, application scenarios, and price performance, but also represent different positions in the crypto asset landscape.
Tezos Domains (TED): Since its launch, it has gained market recognition for its role as a decentralized, open, and adaptable naming system on the Tezos blockchain.
Polkadot (DOT): Since its inception in 2020, it has been hailed as a next-generation blockchain protocol that enables cross-blockchain transfers of any type of data or asset.
This article will provide a comprehensive analysis of the investment value comparison between TED and DOT, focusing on historical price trends, supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, technological ecosystems, and future predictions, attempting to answer the question that concerns investors most:
"Which is the better buy right now?" I. Price History Comparison and Current Market Status
Click to view real-time prices:

Disclaimer: The above predictions are based on historical data and market analysis. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile and subject to various unpredictable factors. These projections should not be considered as financial advice or guarantees of future performance.
TED:
| 年份 | 预测最高价 | 预测平均价格 | 预测最低价 | 涨跌幅 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.0061451 | 0.004238 | 0.00398372 | 0 |
| 2026 | 0.0066970995 | 0.00519155 | 0.004360902 | 22 |
| 2027 | 0.0076681789275 | 0.00594432475 | 0.0052904490275 | 40 |
| 2028 | 0.008643939835212 | 0.00680625183875 | 0.003879563548087 | 60 |
| 2029 | 0.009810871712966 | 0.007725095836981 | 0.00401704983523 | 82 |
| 2030 | 0.009206382963722 | 0.008767983774973 | 0.006137588642481 | 106 |
DOT:
| 年份 | 预测最高价 | 预测平均价格 | 预测最低价 | 涨跌幅 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 4.19752 | 2.956 | 1.95096 | 0 |
| 2026 | 4.0059712 | 3.57676 | 1.8599152 | 20 |
| 2027 | 4.208415816 | 3.7913656 | 3.108919792 | 28 |
| 2028 | 4.15988633632 | 3.999890708 | 2.7999234956 | 35 |
| 2029 | 4.6102740300408 | 4.07988852216 | 3.05991639162 | 37 |
| 2030 | 5.4313515951255 | 4.3450812761004 | 2.302893076333212 | 46 |
⚠️ Risk Warning: The cryptocurrency market is highly volatile. This article does not constitute investment advice. None
Q1: What are the main differences between TED and DOT? A: TED is a decentralized naming system on the Tezos blockchain, while DOT is the native token of Polkadot, a next-generation blockchain protocol enabling cross-chain interoperability. DOT has a larger market cap and trading volume, while TED focuses on a more niche application.
Q2: Which coin has shown better price performance historically? A: DOT has shown more significant price movements, reaching an all-time high of $54.98 in 2021 but also experiencing a major downturn to $2.13 in 2025. TED's price history is less extensive, with a high of $0.115496 and a low of $0.002525.
Q3: What are the long-term price predictions for TED and DOT? A: By 2030, TED is predicted to reach $0.006137588642481 - $0.009206382963722 in the base scenario, while DOT is expected to reach $2.302893076333212 - $5.4313515951255. However, these predictions are subject to market volatility and should not be considered financial advice.
Q4: How should investors allocate their portfolio between TED and DOT? A: Conservative investors might consider allocating 20% to TED and 80% to DOT, while more aggressive investors could opt for a 40% TED and 60% DOT split. The exact allocation should depend on individual risk tolerance and investment goals.
Q5: What are the main risks associated with investing in TED and DOT? A: Both coins face market risks, including volatility and liquidity concerns. TED may face technical risks related to scalability and network stability, while DOT's risks include parachain auction dynamics and network security. Both are also subject to regulatory risks as global policies evolve.
Q6: Which coin is better suited for long-term investment? A: DOT may be more suitable for long-term investment due to its established ecosystem, larger market cap, and focus on interoperability solutions. However, TED could offer growth potential in the niche market of blockchain domain services. The choice depends on an investor's risk tolerance and belief in the specific use cases of each project.
Share
Content